Page 40 - BJS vol. 35
P. 40

32     Bangladesh J. Sugarcane, 35 : 28-36                            June, 2014



                     sucrose%  and  top  weight.  Kumar  and  Kumar  (2014)  also  reported  similar  result  in
                     sugarcane.

                     Table 2.   Phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients between yield and yield
                              contributing characters of randomly selected ten sugarcane genotypes

                       Traits   NT/C   NMC/C   CSH     CSG      LL     LB     Brix%   CY/C
                        G%      0.25    -0.18   -0.14   0.34   -0.89**   0.22   -0.13   0.89**   r p
                                0.70   0.91**   0.59   0.36    0.39    0.69   1.58*    0.10     r g
                       NT/C             0.24   0.33    -0.12   -0.66*   -0.93**   0.11   0.17   r p
                                       1.60**   0.06   1.03**   0.50   0.94**   1.26**   0.12   r g
                      NMC/C                    0.22    0.10    0.55    -0.14   -0.29   0.67*    r p
                                               0.18   -0.86*   1.17    -1.03   -0.67*   0.08*   r g
                       CSH                             -0.27   0.41    0.46   -0.02    0.15     r p
                                                       0.88*   -1.19   -0.66*   1.26*   0.09**   r g
                       CSG                                    -1.69*   -0.41   0.15    0.06     r p
                                                               0.06    0.88**   0.70**   0.34   r g
                        LL                                             0.86   1.12**   -0.09    r p
                                                                       1.01**   -1.15   0.68**   r g
                        LB                                                    0.46**   -0.04*   r p
                                                                              -0.90   -0.63     r g
                       Brix%                                                          -0.21**   r p
                                                                                      -1.05     r g

                     Here, r>1.0, may be due to subtraction effects arising from sampling error
                     * and ** indicates significant at 5% and 1% level, respectively

                     Path analysis
                            Path coefficient analysis among all characters related to CY/C  derived from F 1
                     crosses was estimated separately at phenotypic and genotypic levels. The direct, indirect
                     and total effects of eight characters on average CY/C over two seasons are presented in
                     Table 3.
                     Germination percentage (G%)
                            The  direct  effect  at  phenotypic  level  of  this  character  was  positive  (0.63)  and
                     exhibited highly significant positive association with CY/C. In this level the contribution of
                     other  characters  indirectly  on  cane  yield  through  G%  appeared  to  be  positive  value  in
                     respect of NT (0.09), CSH (0.04), CSG (0.02), LL (0.11) and LB (0.13). The contribution
                     had negative indirect effects via NMC (-0.16) and Brix% (-0.008). In case of genotypic
                     level the direct effect of G% (0.17) and other characters those are indirectly involved
                     on yield character via G% except NT/C (-0.80) and Brix% (-2.55) were positive. In this
                     level  the total effects of G% was positive (0.89 and  0.10) at  phenotypic and genotypic
                     levels, respectively.  The total effect of G% at phenotypic level was higher than others but
                     at genotypic level it was lower than LL and CSG.
                     Number of tillers per clump (NT/C)
                            The NT/C expressed a considerably positive direct effect on cane yield (0.37) at
                     phenotypic level but it was negative (-1.12) at genotypic level. This character had positive
                     correlation with CY/C at phenotypic and genotypic levels. The indirect effect of NT/C was
                     positive  through  NMC/C  (0.22)  and  LL  (0.08)  and  negative  via  CSH  (-0.10),  CSG
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45