Page 502 - SBR Integrated Workbook STUDENT S18-J19
P. 502

Chapter 25









                   Example 3




                   Cash flow analysis


                   Although Swan’s overall cash balance has decreased year-on-year, it
                   generated a healthy surplus from its trading operations. This is important and
                   would be looked at favourably by investors.

                   Swan made a significant loss on the disposal of PPE. It may be that
                   depreciation rates are too lenient, or that Swan has a significant amount of
                   surplus or idle assets. The impairment of goodwill suggests that business
                   combinations were overpaid for. These factors may point towards a future
                   decline in Swan’s performance.

                   Inventories and receivables have increased year-on-year. There may be valid
                   reasons for this, but it could suggest poor inventory management and
                   deterioration in credit control. These negative impacts on cash flow have been
                   offset by an increase in payables year-on-year. However, if the business is
                   taking longer to pay its suppliers then it might not be taking advantage of
                   prompt payment discounts. There may also be a risk that suppliers will
                   shorten or withdraw Swan’s credit facilities.

                   Swan has purchased PPE during the year. However, the amount spent on
                   PPE during the year is much lower than the annual depreciation charge.
                   Swan’s investment activities may not be sufficient to grow – or sustain – the
                   business, which may have a negative impact on future cash flows. However, it
                   might be that further PPE expenditure is not currently required, particularly if
                   Swan has sold surplus PPE.

                   In contrast to the relatively low PPE expenditure, Swan has paid a significant
                   dividend. This seems somewhat short-termist. Dividends are not mandatory,
                   and a smaller dividend payment would have prevented Swan ending the year
                   in a net overdraft position. Overdrafts incur high interest charges, and so this
                   decision demonstrates poor budgeting and cash management.

                   Conclusion

                   Swan generates strong net cash flows from its trading operations. However,
                   the large dividend payment and the negative year-end cash balance raise
                   questions about cash management and stewardship of assets. Moreover, the
                   impairments, losses on disposal, and lack of investment may suggest a
                   decline in future performance.




               496
   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507