Page 32 - P6 Slide Taxation - Lecture Day 3 - VAT Part 2
P. 32
COURT CASE: CSARS v British Airways Plc:
BA is a VAT vendor in RSA making zero-rated supplies by providing
international transport. The tickets that BA charges consist of various
elements that are separately reflected on the ticket issued to the passenger:
→ Bulk of airfare (ordinary part of the ticket);
→ Operating costs (such as airport levies, luggage handling, etc).
SARS wanted BA to pay over output tax at 14% on the charge of operating
costs, being the service charge levied by ACSA.
Supreme Court ofAppeal decided that section 8(15) of the VATAct does not
intend for a vendor to levy different rates of VAT on services provided by
other suppliers. BA itself only renders one service to the passengers and
does not in itself render the different services that make up this single
charge. BA is merely recovering its costs in using or making use of other
service providers and does not provide these services to the passengers
itself.
Conclusion: BA was correct in calculating zero-rate
VAT on their full service charge.