Page 52 - FINAL CFA II SLIDES JUNE 2019 DAY 6
P. 52

LOS 25.h: Compare the discounted cash flow, comparable                               READING 25: MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS
      company, and comparable transaction analyses for valuing a target
      company, including the advantages and disadvantages of each.
                                                                                         MODULE 25.3: TARGET COMPANY VALUATION

      Discounted cash flow analysis:
                                                                      Comparable company analysis:
      Advantages:
      •  It is relatively easy to model any changes in target’s cash flow resulting   Advantages:
         from operating synergies or changes in cost structure.       •  Data for comparable companies is easy to access.
      •  Based on forecasts of fundamental conditions rather than current data.  •  Assumption that similar assets should have similar values is fundamentally sound.
      •  The model is easy to customize.                              •  Estimates derived directly from the market than assumptions about the future.

      Disadvantages:                                                  Disadvantages:
      •  Rapidly growing target may have negative FCFs to large       •  Is market always accurate?
         CAPEX…value becomes negative?                                •  You still need to determine takeover premium separately!
      •  Estimates of future cash flows and earnings are highly subject to error.   •  Difficult to incorporate merger synergies or changing capital structures into the analysis.
      •  Discount rate changes over time? Especially if terminal value is main   •  Historical data used to estimate a takeover premium may not be timely, and therefore
         factor..
                                                                         may not reflect current conditions in the M&A market.

      Comparable transaction analysis

      Advantages:
      •  As is uses data from actual transactions, no need to estimate a separate takeover premium.
      •  Directly from recent market prices for actual deals completed rather than from assumptions and estimates about the future.
      •  Use of actual prices from recent transactions reduces risk that the target’s shareholders could litigate against the its managers and board for mispricing the deal.
      Disadvantages:
      •  Is market always accurate? If past transactions were mis-priced, this will spill over!
      •  Do we have enough comparable transactions to develop a reliable data set? If so, try M&A deals from other industries that are not similar enough!
      •  It is difficult to incorporate merger synergies or changing capital structures into the analysis.
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55