Page 25 - CIMA MCS Workbook November 2018 - Day 2 Tasks
P. 25

ADVANCED FINANCIAL REPORTING (F2) ‐ PRACTICE TASKS


                  TASK 2 (ACCOUNTING ISSUE)

                  Trigger and task



                  You receive the following e‐mail



                  From:      Matthew Jones, Production Director

                  To:        Finance Manager

                  Subject:    ‘The stub’

                  As you are aware, our carbonated drinks are sold in standard 1‐litre and 2‐litre bottles as our
                  largest market is supermarkets who sell the large bottles (either as single units or multi‐packs) to
                  households when doing their weekly shopping. I think that we are missing a trick here as many
                  supermarket shoppers also buy a number of smaller size carbonated drinks for children. Smaller
                  bottles have the advantage of not losing their fizz as quickly once they have been opened. In
                  addition, I’m looking into shape of the bottles, and whether they should have a ‘drinking spout’
                  top, or the screw‐top we currently use on our large bottles.

                  I think a square‐shaped bottle ‘the stub’ would be distinctive in the marketplace and would also
                  be easier for storage purposes in our warehouses, for distribution and storage at supermarkets
                  and even in household fridges. The bottle would have a ‘drinking spout’ top and the intention is
                  that it would be 100% recyclable. These factors may also help us to improve our market share of
                  the airline industry where size and shape of products airlines buy is critical, given the limited
                  space on an aircraft.


                  I’m about to commit some of my budget to get things started which will include Nisha Mistry the
                  R&D manager obtaining and using a number of different moulds to determine the best bottle size
                  and shape, along with the most appropriate material to use to ensure that it will be recyclable.
                  Roger Grapple advised me to to get an understanding of the financial reporting consequences of
                  undertaking this activity as it needs to be discussed at the next directors’ board meeting and not
                  many of us are accountancy experts.

                  Elements of cost that I expect to incur on this project include:


                  Nisha Mistry’s salary cost for 1 year           Z$60,000

                  Recruitment and employment of research assistant  Z$30,000

                  Use of Nish’a departmental resources, materials etc  Z$200,000

                  Purchase of moulds                             Z$300,000

                  The moulds will have no alternative use at the end of the project. Even if we make a decision on
                  the size and shape of the bottle, a heavy‐duty production mould will need to be manufactured.
                  The heavy‐duty production mould will cost Z$5,000,000 and will only be produced if Grapple has
                  decided to go into commercial production with ‘the stub’.


                  KAPLAN PUBLISHING                                                                    45
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30