Page 140 - CFPA-SCR-Award in General Insurance W01_2018-19_Neat
P. 140

9/12          W01/March 2018  Award in General Insurance




                        D2A The FATF Forty Recommendations
                        The original FATF Forty Recommendations were drawn up in 1990 as an initiative to combat the misuse of
                        financial systems by persons laundering drug money. In 1996 the Recommendations were revised for the
                        first time to reflect evolving money laundering trends and techniques, and to broaden their scope well
                        beyond drug-money laundering. In October 2001 the FATF expanded its mandate to deal with the issue of
                        the funding of terrorist acts and terrorist organisations, and took the important step of creating the Eight
                        (later expanded to Nine) Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing. The FATF Recommendations
                        were revised a second time in 2003, and these, together with the Special Recommendations, have been
                        endorsed by over 180 countries, and are universally recognised as the international standard for anti-
                        money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).

                        D2B Nine Special Recommendations on Terrorist Financing
                        Recognising the vital importance of taking action to combat the financing of terrorism, the FATF has
                        agreed these Recommendations, which, when combined with the FATF 40 Recommendations on money
                        laundering, set out the basic framework to detect, prevent and suppress the financing of terrorism and
                        terrorist acts:
                        1.  Ratification and implementation of UN instruments.
                        2.  Criminalising the financing of terrorism and associated money laundering.
                        3.  Freezing and confiscating terrorist assets.
                        4.  Reporting suspicious transactions related to terrorism.
                        5.  International cooperation.
                        6.  Alternative remittance.
                        7.  Wire transfers.
                        8.  Non-profit organisations.
                        9.  Cash couriers.

                        D3 Customer due diligence (CDD)

                        By understanding the risks of money laundering and the financing of terrorism, insurers are in a position
                        to determine what can be done to control these risks, and which procedures and measures can be
                        implemented effectively and efficiently.
                        For reasons of sound business practice and proper risk management insurers should already have
                        controls in place to assess the risk of each business relationship. As customer due diligence (CDD)isa
                        business practice suitable for commercial risk assessment and fraud prevention as well as preventing
                        money laundering and the financing of terrorism, control measures should be linked to these existing
                        controls.
                        The concept of CDD goes beyond the identification and verification of only the policyholder – it extends
                        to identification of the potential risks of the whole business relationship. It should also include:
                        • making underwriting checks;
                        • recognising and reporting suspicious customers/transactions; and
                        • reviewing provisions affecting the organisation and the staff, such as the compliance and audit
                          environment, keeping of records, recruitment of staff and training.
    9                   D3A Performing due diligence on customers, beneficial owners and beneficiaries
    Chapter             Customer due diligence measures that should be taken by insurers include:



                        • identifying the customer and verifying that customer’s identity using reliable, independent source
                          documents, data or information;
                        • determining whether the customer is acting on behalf of another person, and then taking reasonable
                          steps to obtain sufficient identification data to verify the identity of that other person;
                        • identifying the (ultimate) beneficial owner, and taking reasonable measures to verify that identity – for
                          legal persons (companies and partnerships) and other legal arrangements insurers should take
                          reasonable measures to understand the ownership and control structure of the customer;
                        • obtaining information on the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship and other
                          relevant factors; and
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145