Page 173 - Ciancia, On Civilization's Edge
P. 173

30
               the benefits of the new system of farming.”  Three years later, a special issue of the same
               newspaper, which was celebrating the tenth anniversary of Polish state rule in Volhynia, made


               similar claims about local appreciation for the post-1926 efforts to improve rural life. One of the

               articles—written by a pro-Sanacja Ukrainian activist and tellingly published in both the Polish and

               the Ukrainian languages—described how the “artificially fabricated partitions” between Poles and


                                                                              31
               Ukrainians were fading away as a consequence of the state’s efforts.  Mixed cooperatives, “in which
               people of various nations, languages, and religions find the possibilities of cooperative work,” he

               went on, also constituted evidence of “the healthy impetus of the Volhynian village toward self-

                     32
               help.”  But if Sanacja attempts to transform physical environments and social relations in the

               countryside were cast as evidence of a common cause between the benevolent state and an

               enthusiastic and grateful peasantry, a second narrative suggested the darker side of the Sanacja’s

               civilizing mission toward the Ukrainian-speaking masses.


                       Mud constituted a particular obsession for state officials who perceived a destructively

               cyclical relationship between physical environments and peasants. There was certainly a surfeit of

               the stuff. In a province where a mere 38% of land was used for agriculture in 1926, Sanacja


               personnel made efforts to transform what they saw as muddy wasteland into places that could sustain

               crops, and, in 1927, county-level authorities organized drainage projects (melioracja), for which they

                                                                                                      33
               gained funds from the Ministry for Public Works in Warsaw and local government authorities.

               None of this was easy work, particularly in the province’s marshy northern regions. As one engineer

               who investigated the issue in Kostopol county reported, the river watersheds were much larger here

               than they were elsewhere in Poland, meaning that a successful program of melioracja required the




               30  Ibid., 2.
               31  “Gdy dzwony dzwonią,” Przegląd Wołyński, June 16, 1929, 4-5.
               32  “Zdrowe Objawy,” Wołyń, June 4, 1933, 2.
               33  According to an article in Volhynia Life, 25% was meadow and pastures, 24% forests, and 13% lakes, wastelands,
               and marshes. “Rolnictwo a samorząd na Wołyniu,” Życie Wołynia, February 21, 1926, 8-9; “Sprawy melioracyjne
               na Wołyniu,” Życie Wołynia, April 10, 1927, 4.


                                                             173
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178