Page 226 - Ciancia, On Civilization's Edge
P. 226

“native” dialect (gwara). In other words, the valorization of an imagined version of local life meant

               that a certain type of Polishness—in this case, the use of the Polish language by non-Polish


               villagers—could itself be seen as inauthentic if it was being done simply to appeal to an imagined

               audience. While the regional project rested on the discourse of ethnic, national, and social inclusivity,

               non-Polish groups were included only if they behaved according to particular elite scripts about what


               constituted authentic behavior in the first place.



                                                   [INSERT FIGURE 6.3]

               Figure 6.3: Participants in the Volhynian Regional Course, July-August 1929. Source: Antoni
               Jackowski and Izabela Sołjan, Zarys Historii Geografii w Uniwersytecie Jagiellońskim, published
               online at: http://www.geo.uj.edu.pl/opracowania/historia/



                       If researchers argued that certain versions of Polishness were inauthentic, they clung to the

               idea that the region remained, at its core, a fundamentally Polish place. What, then, did Polishness

               mean to them? For all of their democratic emphasis on the importance of listening to ordinary people,


               the answer to this question lay in the role of Polish elites who provided historical conduits for the

               values of the early modern Commonwealth. Indeed, the average peasant remained the subject, rather

               than the intended audience, of the Yearbook. It featured articles exclusively in Polish for its entire


               publishing run and when it did include translated summaries, they appeared in the international

               languages of academic exchange (French, German, or English), rather than in the local languages of

               Yiddish or Ukrainian. Moreover, articles were written in a densely academic tone that would likely


               have proved off-putting, even for the minority of Volhynian peasants who could technically read the

               Polish language.

                       The historical narrative was also largely based on the idea that it was Poland’s noble


               traditions, rather than those of the peasantry, that had sustained the region’s diversity over the

               centuries. In the second issue of the Yearbook, the editors reproduced a call from Józewski in which




                                                             226
   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231