Page 252 - Ciancia, On Civilization's Edge
P. 252

proactive construction of Ukrainian institutions within the framework of the Polish state. By

               questioning the existence of a national Ukrainian identity, various groups opened up new avenues for


               pursuing aggressive nationalizing policies toward these populations, while simultaneously arguing

               that they were acting peacefully.

                       Accepting that the construction of national indeterminacy was politically expedient does not


               mean denying the fact that national loyalties were amorphous and situational in the kresy. As

               historians have pointed out, populations in borderland areas in general, and in the historic

                                                                                                         19
               borderlands between Poland and Russia in particular, did not always prioritize national identities.

               Considering the hundreds of years of settlement by various populations, the range of Russian

               nationality politics that had been implemented over the long nineteenth century, and the lack of

               “modern” conditions like standardized schooling and high literacy rates, Volhynia’s populations did

               not identify in primarily national terms, at least not in the way that modern nationalists thought that


                           20
               they should.  Indeed, much of the evidence suggests that the everyday behavior of the area’s
               populations profoundly frustrated state officials in the Soviet Union and Poland alike.

                       On the Soviet side of the border, the authorities found that the population’s diversity—its


               myriad dialects, customs, and ways of life—caused problems for state-led attempts to create clear-cut

               boundaries, neat categories, and the kinds of homogenous national groups that would form the basis

               of their modern vision of administrative and political order. On attempting to take stock of


               nationality, for instance, Soviet officials were told that people spoke the “Catholic language,” “in the

                                                     21
               peasant way,” or “the language of here.”  In Poland, officials who attempted to collect statistical
               data faced similar frustrations. Leon Wasilewski, one of the co-architects of the Polish-Soviet border




               19  On national identities not being clear-cut in the kresy, see Olga Linkiewicz, “Peasant Communities in Interwar
               Poland’s Eastern Borderlands: Polish Historiography and the Local Story,” Acta Poloniae Historica 109 (2014), 17–
               36.
               20  Benedict Anderson, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (New York,
               2006).
               21  Brown, A Biography of No Place, 39.


                                                             252
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257