Page 259 - Ciancia, On Civilization's Edge
P. 259

[INSERT FIGURE 7.1]

               Figure 7.1: Types of peasant hut in Polesie and Volhynia, with descriptions. Source: Jerzy
               Niebrzycki, Polesie: opis wojskowo-geograficzny i studjum terenu (Warsaw, 1930).


                       Debates over the correct location for the administrative border between the provinces of

               Polesie and Volhynia had already revealed such dynamics during the 1920s, when a range of


               stakeholders evoked the physical and human liminality of the area to push for their competing

               political agendas in Warsaw. In 1923, the provincial governor of Polesie, Stanisław Downarowicz,

               had sent a memorandum to the Minister of the Interior in which he depicted Polesie as a “future


               Polish corridor between a Belarusian north and a Ukrainian south,” one that had managed hitherto to

               remain outside of the zone of non-Polish nationalizing influences but in which Ukrainian and

               Belarusian “elements” (czynniki) might dangerously “shake hands.” As part of his conclusions, he

               argued that all of the northern areas of the Volhynian province should be detached and connected


                                                                                                     38
               instead to Polesie, since they had a fundamentally Polesian, rather than Volhynian, character.  The
               counties of Sarny and Koszyrski, which were made up of areas that had been part of the Russian

               imperial governorate of Volhynia but had been included in the Polish province of Polesie, proved to

                                                                 39
               be particularly important sites of internal contestation.  A letter penned in the Volhynian provincial

               office and sent to the Ministry of the Interior in February 1925 argued that the two counties needed to

               be rejoined to Volhynia, since they gravitated toward the province in terms of their economic

                                                            40
               development, infrastructure, and administration.  And yet, in the eyes of the Polesian governor, their

               fundamental character remained Polesian, meaning that they should not be relinquished to Volhynia.




               38  Stanisław Downarowicz, “Zarys programu zadań i prac państwowych na Polesiu,” AAN MSW (Part 1) 938/5, 2-
               3. For a history of the Ukrainian movement in Polesie, see “Ruch ukraiński na Polesiu 1918-1933r.,” AAN
               UWwBnB 36/3-43.
               39  The counties were Sarny and Kamień Koszyrski. See Mielcarek, Podziały terytorialno-administracyjne, 49. See
               also Jerzy Stefan Langrod, Ze studjów nad podziałem administracyjnym państwa (Kraków, 1931), 98.
               40  Moreover, they still came under the authority of the regional courts in Łuck and Równe, the director of state
               forests, and the Orthodox and Roman Catholic bishoprics. Letter from Volhynian provincial office to the Ministry of
               the Interior (February 2, 1925), AAN MSW (Part 1) 176 t.II/719-721.


                                                             259
   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264