Page 286 - Ciancia, On Civilization's Edge
P. 286

Poles in an area where the Polish population was already a minority, ethnographers, demographers,

               and army men mobilized the concept of national indeterminacy in order to push for more radical


               political schemes.

                       By the mid-1930s, the acceptance that a Ukrainian national identity existed among the Slavic

               populations, which had been a hallmark of Józewski’s approach, was being replaced by several other


               arguments—that these populations were yet to form a national consciousness, that Ukrainians did not

               constitute a real nation in the first place, and that people might be best understood as ethnographic

               raw material to be exploited by the state. This shift toward highlighting national indeterminacy


               provided Poles with a way of simultaneously denying a non-Polish national identity to such

               populations and prescribing policies of Polonization as the only correct path toward nationalization.

               On September 1, 1939, the same day that German tanks rolled into western Poland (and just a few

               weeks before the Red Army would arrive in the east), an article in the magazine of the Petty Nobles


               Union stated that “the Ukrainian race, rather than the Ruthenian race, is based on lies and

               falsifications of history.” 116  Like the category of “the nation” that historians are so used to critiquing,

               national indeterminacy also needs to be read as a politically expedient construct.


                       If non-Catholic populations in the eastern borderlands faced increased discrimination, the

               logic of that discrimination did not operate in the same way across the board, but instead involved the

               reconceptualization of the precise conditions for inclusion (and exclusion). As Polish elites doubted


               that there was such a thing as a Ukrainian national identity, they began to emphasize that Jews were a

               fundamentally separate group whose foreign characteristics and lack of native roots within the region

               made them inassimilable. Officials used the idea of Jewish separateness not as the basis for granting

               them rights as a national minority, but rather in an attempt to push for their physical removal from


               the state through emigration. As was the case with schemes to undermine the concept of the



               116  “Gdzie leży Ukraina?” Pobudka: Ilustrowany Dwutygodnik Związku Szlachty Zagrodowej (September 1, 1939),
               3.


                                                             286
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291