Page 56 - Ciancia, On Civilization's Edge
P. 56

61
               empire. As such, late nineteenth-century tensions between the landowners’ more pragmatic
               approach to imperialism and the anti-imperial nation-building mission of the leftist intelligentsia


                                                                  62
               assumed a new immediacy as state borders took shape.
                       The competition between Volhynia’s Polish landowners and the Polish activists associated

               with the Guard came down to the question of how far the locus of political power would shift at the


               level of the village. In what ways, people asked, would the new configuration of east European

               sovereignty—a global issue—change what Polish civilization came to mean across the contested

               borderlands? After all, civilization meant something very different to the landowners of Volhynia


               than it did to the democratizing outsiders who filled the ranks of the Guard. During the prewar

               period, local landowners had created a system of social and economic relationships between the

               manor house (dwór) and the surrounding, mainly Orthodox, Slavic population, one that relied on a

               vision of Polish civilizational superiority, rather than political equality. When they subsequently


               recalled this world, they depicted the manor house as a haven of Polish civilization and good

               manners in the countryside, nostalgically celebrating what they saw as the perennial and organic

                                                 63
               nature of the landowners’ privileges.

                       At the end of the war, Polish landowners began to recognize that ideas about what

               civilization might mean were changing—and they tried to get in step with the new global moment. In

               local proclamations, they spoke about their role as “the mainstay of Polishness” who completely


               subordinated class concerns “to the general interest of the whole population” and denied any claims







               61  On the landowners’ loss of Polish national consciousness, see “Memoriał w sprawie położenia na Wołyniu,” 89.
               62  Zarycki, Ideologies of Eastness, 145.
               63  In a memoir about her experiences in a landowning family in the eastern part of Volhynia that was to become part
               of the Soviet Union after the First World War, Zofia Kossak painted a typically nostalgic vision of ethnic harmony,
               based on the peasants’ acceptance of the superiority of the lords of the manor (pany in local dialects), rather than on
               social and political equality. Zofia Kossak, Pożoga (Warsaw, 1935), 9. An analysis of Kossak’s paternalistic style
               can be found in Hanna Gosk, “Polski dyskurs kresowy w niefikcjonalnych zapisach międzywojennych. Próba
               lektury w perspektywie postcolonial studies,” Teksty Drugie 6 (2008), particularly 24-25.


                                                             56
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61