Page 586 - MANUAL OF SOP
P. 586

Relevant Wto Jurisprudence

                     i.     The name of the exporting country or countries and the product
                            involved;
                     ii.    The date of initiation of the investigation;

                     iii.   The basis on which dumping is alleged in the application;
                     iv.    A summary of the factors on which the allegation of injury is based;
                     v.     The address to which representations by interested parties should be
                            directed;

                     vi.    The time-limits allowed to interested parties for making their views
                            known.
               24.19.  The WTO jurisprudence reproduced below in Guatemala – Cement I (DS-
               60), the Panel has determined what constitutes "sufficient evidence to justify the
               initiation of an investigation" under Article 5.3 agreed with the view expressed in
               US Softwood Lumber II (DS-257) and concluded the following:

                     “The Panel in Guatemala – Cement I applied the standard of review set
                     out in Article 17.6(i), referring, in so doing, to the GATT Panel Report in
                     US – Softwood Lumber II. The Panel also agreed with the view expressed
                     by the Panel in US – Softwood Lumber II that "the quantum and quality of
                     the evidence required at the time of initiation is less than that required for a
                     preliminary, or final, determination of dumping, injury, and causation, made
                     after the investigation".

               24.20.  In a WTO dispute Thailand – H-Beams (DS122), the Panel has explained the
               content of notification/public notice in the following manner-

                     “After receipt of a properly documented application and before proceeding
                     to initiate an investigation, the authorities shall notify the government of
                     the exporting Member concerned. The fact of the receipt of a properly
                     documented application would be an essential element of the contents of
                     the notification.”
               24.21.  In a WTO dispute Argentina – Poultry Anti-Dumping Duties (DS241), the
               Panel has explained the obligation of a party with regards to the notification.

                     “Just by fulfilling the requirement to publish a notice of initiation of an
                     investigation, a Member has not fulfilled the obligation to notify. Article
                     12.1 clearly imposes two separate obligations, one to notify and another to




                                                 563
   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591