Page 607 - MANUAL OF SOP
P. 607

Manual of OP for Trade Remedy Investigations


               24.74.  In a WTO Dispute China – Broiler Products (Article 21.5 – US) (DS-427), the
               Panel explained what constitutes “information”.

                     “An investigating authority's request for information from an interested
                     party constitutes "information" within the meaning of Article 6.4, even
                     if made orally.”

               24.75.  In a WTO Dispute EU – Footwear (China) (DS-405), the panel laid the
               following analysis:-

                     "Article 6.2 does not establish any specific obligations with respect to
                     disclosure of or access to information. Certainly, one can posit that any
                     failure to provide information to interested parties means that certain
                     arguments may not be made. This does not, however, mean that any
                     failure in this regard establishes a violation of Article 6.2. It would be
                     inappropriate to impose on investigating authorities a standard of
                     perfection in the conduct of investigations.”

               24.76.  In a WTO Dispute EU – Footwear (China) (DS-405), the panel explained
               the relationship between Article 6.2 and other paragraphs of Article 6 of the Anti-
               Dumping Agreement.

                     “There is nothing in the text of Article 6.2 that would require investigating
                     authorities  to actively  disclose  information  to interested parties.
                     Indeed, there is nothing specific in the text of Article 6.2 that relates to
                     'information' at all. The only specific proscription concerning the 'full
                     opportunity' for parties' defence of their interests is the obligation for
                     investigating authorities to, on request, provide opportunities for parties
                     to meet other parties with adverse interests. It is clear that the obligation
                     to provide for such meetings does not exhaust the scope of parties' rights
                     under Article 6.2. However, while a 'full opportunity' for the defence of
                     a party's interests may well include, conceptually, the notion of access to
                     information, the more specific provisions of Article 6, including Articles
                     6.1.2, 6.4, and 6.9, establish the obligations on investigating authorities
                     in this regard.  Article 6.2 does not add anything specific to the obligations
                     on investigating authorities with respect to interested parties' ability to
                     see or receive information in the hands of the investigating authorities
                     established in other provisions  of Article  6. Thus, while a failure to
                     comply with one of the more specific provisions of Article 6 concerning



                                                 584
   602   603   604   605   606   607   608   609   610   611   612