Page 45 - DIVA_1_2022
P. 45

culture                                                  Culture




 Ambassadors’ Recipes to   Nexus:  Food,  Culture  and  International  described  as  “winning  hearts  and  minds”  of  a
               Relations
                                                      targeted population to make them support policies,
               Food  is  an  essential  ingredient  of  human  goals or cultural traditions. The connection between
 Foster Peace Dialogue  existence  and  has  always  been  important  in  public diplomacy and food can summed up by
               interstate relations and diplomatic practice. It  the old phrase “the way to man’s heart is through
               has been used to communicate culture, identity  his stomach”. Gastrodiplomacy wins hearts and
               and messages which can express friendship or  minds via stomachs.
               animosity. This role is becoming increasingly
               noticeable in public diplomatic practice, but  Culinary  Diplomacy:  What  is  it  and  what
 Ambassadors’ Menu for Peacemaking –   academic accounts of gastro, food or culinary  does it do?
               diplomacy have so far been limited.
                                                      Food  has  long  been  an  important  route  for
 Diplomats’ recipes  For example, the term food diplomacy is rarely  diplomacy; it is the universal medium that all
               used in political and academic discourse but there  humans,  regardless  of  background  or  belief,
               are many examples of it from diplomatic history  can share and enjoy. Culinary diplomacy is a
               and  contemporary  diplomatic  practice.  These  relatively recent term, as is gastrodiplomacy,
 By Evelina Rioukhina in collaboration with Marit Fosse   can be used to assess the role food can play in  but they are increasing in use. The basic idea
 Edited by Ash Charlton •  interstate  relations, public diplomacy, diplomatic  is  sharing  food  with  people  from  different
               communication and “soft power”.        cultures  to  break  down  barriers  and  begin
                                                      fostering  cultural  understanding  among
               Food as “soft power” vs “hard power”   countries.
               Joseph Nye, an influential theorist on international
               relations,  is  credited  with  coining  the  term  soft    “Culinary diplomacy” vs
               power,  using  it  in  distinction  to  “hard  power”  “Gastrodiplomacy”
               based  on  military  capability  and  coercion,  The  terms  “culinary  diplomacy”  and
               which  dominates  so-called  realist  theories  of  “gastrodiplomacy”  have  been  used  since  the
               international  relations.  Soft  power  uses  other  early 2000s. Both terms have been popularized
               means  to  influence  desired  outcomes,  and  the  by American public diplomacy scholars Paul
               concept  has  gained  prominence  in  the  post-  Rockower and Sam Chapple-Sokol. Rockower
               Cold War period. Nye  argued that the Cold War  defines  gastrodiplomacy  as  a  tool  of  public
               changed the nature of power and security in world  diplomacy,  while  culinary  diplomacy  is
               politics. The central question for the great powers  “a  means  to  further  diplomatic  protocol
               was how to achieve influence in a              complex and  through  cuisine”.  Chapple-Sokol  considers
               increasingly interdependent international political  that culinary diplomacy is the general term,
               environment.  To  quote  Nye,  “If  a  state  can  and gastrodiplomacy refers to its public face.
               make  its  power  seem  legitimate  in  the  eyes  Rockower says food can be a key element of a
               of  others,  it  will  encounter  less  resistance  “nation branding” strategy, a method that holds
               to its wishes. If its culture and ideology are  great  promise  for  “middle  powers”  seeking  to
               attractive, others will more willingly follow.  increase international influence through cultural
               If  it  can  establish  international  norms  promotion. Chapple-Sokol believes use of food in
               consistent with its society, it is less likely to  diplomacy has always been an important form of
               have to change. If it can support institutions  non-verbal communication. He defines culinary
               that make other states wish to channel or limit  diplomacy as use of food on a government-to-
               their  activities  in  ways  the  dominant  state  government level. As a tactic it is many-faceted,
               prefers, it may be spared the costly exercise of  with thousands of years of history behind it. It
               coercive or hard power”.               includes issues like how people are seated at a
                                                      table, the food presented, and the venue chosen.
               Breaking of bread to win hearts and minds                                     • Ash Charlton is
               In  other  words,  soft  power  encompasses  an  Food is an ambassador in and of itself  a writer, editor,
               abundance  of  mostly  non-tangible  factors  and  Historically  food  has  often  been  used   consultant and
                                                                                             freelance trainer
               instruments  such  as  attractiveness,  influence,  to  build  peace,  even  though  it  has  only   who has worked
               image or ideology. Its final aim is to create appeal,  recently  returned  to  popularity  in  global   with the UN for
               attraction, and non-military persuasion. It is often  public  diplomacy.  The  Romans  used  food   over 15 years.



     w w w. d i va i n t e r n at i o n a l . c h  w w w. d i va i n t e r n at i o n a l . c h
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50