Page 15 - 86064_NSAA_W19_web
P. 15

group and the industry must ensure that it keeps them    decisions. Another reason may be one’s significant other had
              skiing because they are the future senior skiers. Programs   a strong dislike of winter.  Rather than take individual vaca-
              developed for today’s senior skiers can be leveraged for   tions, the couple started going places other than a ski area.
              tomorrow’s senior skiers.                                  Probably the number one reason is cost. Skiing can
                 NSAA’s data shows that the average Pre-Boomer skied   be expensive. Depending on where you go, for a family of
              9.78 days and the Baby-Boomer 6.86. Research done by   four a ski trip can cost anywhere from $800 to more than
              SeniorsSkiing.com (a virtual community for snow enthusiasts    $1,000 per day for lifts, ski rentals, condo or hotel room,
              over the age of 50) strongly suggests the senior skier is    transportation, meals, etc., and may put a ski vacation out
              a potential vehicle that can be leveraged to increase the total   of reach for some families.
              number of skiers. The online publication with thousands    Vacations are often family decisions and as children get
              of skiers over the age of 55 surveyed its subscribers and   older, they get a voice if not a vote. Some may want to go
              learned their average reader skis 15 days a year and visits    to the beach; others choose skiing. As a result, the annual
              three ski areas each season. One-third skied 23 days a    ski vacation loses.
              year! Fifty-six percent stated they spent between $1,000    The challenge for the ski industry as a whole is to find
              and $5,000 on skiing last season, and 10 percent spent   ways to get seniors and the lapsed skiers back. What programs
              more than $5,000.                                      does your area offer? What are you willing to implement?
                 This not only confirms NSAA’s data, it makes it hard   You may want to consider some (or all) of the following:
              to ignore. Imagine how many more skiers there would be   •  Offering social events
              if the industry ramped up its collective effort to target this   •  Creating a senior club
              skier segment and leveraged it to attract new skiers and   •  Reaching out to current and former season passholders
              bring back those who stepped away.                         with a “Bring-A-Friend Back to Skiing” offer
                                                                     •  Working with active/over-55 communities
              The Lapsed or Lost Skier
              Let’s start with what NSAA calls the “lapsed skier” who is   Seniors as ‘Bringers’ of New Skiers
              “lost” to the sport because by definition, this person skied   When most of the current senior skiers started skiing, they
              at an earlier age and dropped out. Why?                were expected to live into their late 60s or maybe into their
                 There are those whose choice of careers limited their   early 70s. Now, actuaries and financial analysts say senior
              ability to ski. It could be as simple as geography, with the   skiers need to plan to live well into their 80s!
              nearest ski area a day’s flight away. Or, it could be more com-  The trend of living longer is reflected by the ever-
              plex. Work and social priorities may have dictated work/life   increasing age needed to qualify for senior discounts at


              Figure 2  Participants (US Residents)
                                                                                  Gen Z (21 & under)
                 5.0
                                                                                  Millennials (22–37)
                 4.5                                                              Gen X (38–53)
                                                                                  Boomers (54–72)
                       4.36
                 4.0                                                              Pre-Boomers (73 & over)            3.15
               Participants (in millions)  3.0  2.53                                                                 2.53
                 3.5



                 2.5
                                                                                                                     2.34
                       2.22
                 2.0
                 1.5
                                                                                                                     1.15
                 1.0

                 0.5
                       0.27
                                                                                                                     0.07
                       0.18
                 0.0
                     2004–05  2005–06  2006–07  2007–08  2008–09  2009–10  2010–11  2011–12  2012–13  2013–14  2014–15  2015–16  2016–17  2017–18

                                                                                               WINTER 2019  |  NSAA JOURNAL  |  13
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20