Page 63 - 86064_NSAA_W19_web
P. 63

explored banding together to form a single group health   all. Even fully insured association MEWAs are often sub­
              plan, but their desire to do so has been thwarted by the   ject to certification requirements under state law, as well as
              realities of federal and state MEWA regulations. That’s   other requirements such as a minimum period for a bona
              because the federal and state regulations currently imposed   fide association to be in existence before it can provide a
                                                                     health plan.
                                                                         Now let’s get into why an association may want to create
                The new regulations may result in                    its own AHP and why participating employers may want to

                coverage under an AHP that is less                   join that AHP.
                                                                         For members of some associations, such as NSAA, the
                expensive than coverage offered                      new regulations may result in coverage under an AHP that is
                                                                     less expensive than coverage offered through the individual
                through the individual and small                     and small group health insurance markets under the ACA.

                group health insurance markets                       There are several factors that could result in lower cost—at
                                                                     least for some individuals and small employers.
                under the ACA.
                                                                     1. Under the new rule, compliant AHPs will be treated as
                                                                     one single large employer plan rather than an aggregation
              on MEWAs are substantial and may sometimes make cre at­  of small employer and individual plans. Thus, they will not
              ing a MEWA impractical. This difficulty is particularly    be required to cover the ACA’s 10 essential health benefits
              present where a MEWA would attempt to cover employers    (like providing vision care, mental health benefits, etc.).
              in multiple states (across state lines), in which case they   This means an AHP could, for example, choose not to cover
              may find widely differing and conflicting state laws and,   pediatric dental and vision or rehabilitative services. Or, it
              in the case of self­insured MEWAs, no clear avenue for the   could exclude coverage for prescription drugs or inpatient
              MEWA to lawfully operate within one or more states at   hospital care. It may also exclude coverage for specific









































                                                                                               WINTER 2019  |  NSAA JOURNAL  |  61
   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68