Page 212 - erewhon
P. 212

Besides, people have such a strong natural bias towards it
       that they will seek it for themselves and act upon it quite
       as much as or more than is good for them: there is no need
       of encouraging reason. With unreason the case is different.
       She is the natural complement of reason, without whose ex-
       istence reason itself were non-existent.
          If,  then,  reason  would  be  non-existent  were  there  no
       such thing as unreason, surely it follows that the more un-
       reason there is, the more reason there must be also? Hence
       the necessity for the development of unreason, even in the
       interests of reason herself. The Professors of Unreason deny
       that they undervalue reason: none can be more convinced
       than they are, that if the double currency cannot be rigor-
       ously deduced as a necessary consequence of human reason,
       the double currency should cease forthwith; but they say
       that it must be deduced from no narrow and exclusive view
       of reason which should deprive that admirable faculty of
       the one-half of its own existence. Unreason is a part of rea-
       son; it must therefore be allowed its full share in stating the
       initial conditions.














                                                      11
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217