Page 303 - J. C. Turner "History and Science of Knots"
P. 303

294                     History and Science of Knots

              Leaving those somewhat facetious comments aside, we believe we have
          presented a reasonable case for the affirmative-The Study of Knots may be
          designated a Science! We believe that this Chapter, allied with the evidence
          of many of the other Chapters in this book, strongly supports our view. More-
          over, we believe we have shown that the field of this Science is much wider than
          the restrictive one of the topological knot theorist; to use Schaake's words, it
          must be broad enough to deal with `real knots', as well as `hypothetical ones'.
              It seems pertinent here to give the following quotation, from a discussion
          about the position which the science of number occupies with respect to the
          general body of human knowledge:*

               It seems to me that what Philosophy lacks most is a principle of
               relativity ...
               A principle of relativity is just a code of limitations: it defines
               the boundaries wherein a discipline shall move and frankly admits
               that there is no way of ascertaining whether a certain body of facts
               is the manifestation of the observata, or the hallucination of the
               observer. Tobias Danzig

              In these terms, I have tried to shed light on what might be a principle of
          relativity for the Philosophy of Knots.
              Whether you will agree with me or not on the above issues, I know I
          can assert, without any doubt, that whatever it is called, the study of knots
          will continue to fascinate and exercise the minds of men and women for as
          long as humankind exists. That is assured because knots will always be useful
          to them; because knots are beautiful and mysterious objects; and because
          the expanding fields of knot studies will pose ever more complex problems,
          challenging our descendants to solve them.


          10. References

              1. C. W. Ashley, The Ashley Book of Knots
                (Doubleday, New York, 1944) 620 pp.
              2. C. L. Day, The Art of Knotting and Splicing
                (Dodd, Mead and Company, New York, 1st edn. 1947; Naval Institute
                Press, Annapolis, Maryland, 2nd edn. 1955) 225 pp.
              3. D. J. Albers, `Freeman Dyson: Mathematician, Physicist, and Writer',
                 The College Mathematics Journal, MAA 25 No. 1 (January, 1944)
                2-21.

          *In:`The Two Realities ', from Number- The Language of Science (Doubleday, 1954) 232-
          253.
   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308