Page 53 - IBC Orders us 7-CA Mukesh Mohan
P. 53

Order Passed Under Sec 7
                                                                              Hon’ble NCLT Principal Bench

               present Tribunal when, a default has occurred. It is thus obvious that the lead bank like the petitioner is

               thus  competent  to  file  this  application  on  its  own  behalf  and  other  banks  who  are  members  of  the
               Consortium.


               12.     In order to ascertain whether the default has occurred. it will be profitable to read Section 3 (12)
               of  the  Code  which  states  that  default  means  non-payment  of  debt  when  whole  or  any  part  of  the
               instalment of the debt has become due 8[, payable and the same has not been repaid by the 'Corporate

               Debtor'. In the present case, it has come on record that the default has occurred many a time when the
               restructuring had taken place in 2011 and 2013. In any case finally a default has occurred when the loan

               account of the 'Corporate Debtor' was classified as NPA on 30.09.2014 in accordance with the guidelines
               issued by the Reserve Bank of India. In that regard particulars of financial debt have been mentioned
               indicating that default occurred on 30.06.2014 when the first quarterly instalment of the term loan was

               due  for  payment  (Annexure  A-46).  In  part  IV  of  Form-1  a  sum  of  Rs.  86,79,49,061.33/-  only  as  on
               15.05.2017 has been claimed to be a defaulted amount and the figure has been rectified by the affidavit
               filed on 07.06.2017. The total defaulted amount is claimed to be over Rs. 1,09,32,72,312.86/- as per para

               9 of affidavit.

               13.     Learned  counsel  for  the  petitioner  has  argued  that  in  the  additional  affidavit  it  has  been

               adequately  explained  that  the  present  petition  has  been  instituted  by  Shri  Rahulcndu  Singh  who  is
               working  as  Senior  Manager,  New  Delhi  Large  Corporate  Branch  of  Bank  of  India.  According  to  the
               learned  counsel  he  has  been  duly  authorized  by  the  General  Manager  SiShri  Ram  Krishna  Sinha  and

               Mrityunjay Kumar Gupta. It has been pointed out there is a resolution concerning delegation of power to
               General  Manager  for  granting  Power  of  Attorney  to  other  officers  like  Shri  Rahulendu  Singh.  On

               27.05.2016 a resolution by the Bank of India was passed with regard to delegation of powers to General
               Managers for granting Power of Attorney to other officers (Annexure A-1 with the additional affidavit).
               In the aforesaid meeting Memorandum No. HR/T&P/P0A/ASC/16-17 dated 27.05.2016 was submitted by

               Human Resources Department for-seeking approval for delegation of Powers to General Managers for
               granting Power of Attorney to other officers and it was considered and resolved as under:


               "IT WAS RESOLVED THAT

               APPROVAL  he  and  is  hereby  accorded  for  granting  Comprehensive  General  Manager's  Power  of

               Attorney in favour of:

                              (i)    Shri Nikhilcsh Bhargava;


                              (ii)   Shri Bhalchandra Vasudeo Upadhye;


                                                                                                           53
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58