Page 793 - IBC Orders us 7-CA Mukesh Mohan
P. 793

Order Passed Under Sec 7
                                                                       By Hon’ble NCLT New Delhi-II Bench

               1 crore was duly paid to her for the period 01.12.2014 to 31.03.2015. The TDS on the aforesaid was also
               deposited by the Corporate Debtor and is reflected in her Form 26AS.


               4. The petitioner further acknowledges having received interest on the outstanding loan of Rs.1 crore till
               29.02.2016. Documents evidencing the same have been filed on record. It is only after 29.02.2016 that the
               Corporate  Debtor  defaulted  in  paying  the  interest  component  and  therefore  the  Petitioner/  Financial

               Creditor demanded return of her loan of Rs.1 crore. As no steps were taken by the Corporate Debtor, a
               demand notice u/ s 433-434 of the Companies Act, 1956 was issued which was followed by initiating a

               Winding  Up  petition  before  the  Hon'ble  High  Court  of  Delhi  being  CP  No.1257/2016.  This  was
               subsequently transferred to the NCLT, but was withdrawn on 20.03.2017 with liberty to initiate a fresh
               petition on the same cause of action under the IBC.


               5. Notice of motion was duly effected on the Corporate Debtor, but none appeared. The petition has been
               filed in the form and  manner prescribed. A perusal of the aforesaid facts satisfies this Bench that the

               petitioner had initially given an unsecured loan of Rs.1.5 crores of which Rs.50 lakhs were returned on
               10.12.2014. The balance outstanding loan of Rs.1 crore is clearly a recoverable debt and is being claimed
               within  the  period  of  limitation.  The  payment  of  periodic  interest  upto  29.02.2016,  which  is  not  only

               reflected in the Bank Accounts of the petitioner, but also by deposit of the TDS (194A) by the Corporate
               Debtor  as  reflected  in  the  Form-26AS,  is  an  acknowledgment  of  debt.  The  petitioner  satisfies  the
               definition of a Financial Creditor and the Respondent of being a Corporate Debtor as defined under the

               Code. There has been a default by the Respondent Corporate Debtor. The non-payment of the aforesaid
               debt which is also recoverable with Creditor to initiate Insolvency Resolution Process. The petitioner has

               named Mr. Ashish Aggarwal as the Insolvency Resolution Professional who has given his consent to act
               as the Interim Resolution Professional vide his communication dated 15.03.2017 attaching alongwith his
               registration  certificate  issued  by  the  IBBI  qualifying  him  to  act  as  the  Insolvency  Professional  in

               accordance with the Regulation. He has also certified that he is not disqualified to act as the IRP..

               6.  For  the  reasons  aforesaid,  this  petition  stands  admitted.  Mr.  Ashish  Agarwal,  Registration  no.

               IBBI/IPA-001-IP-00153/2016- 2017/1206 is hereby appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional. A
               moratorium is declared in terms of Section 14 of the IBC prohibiting:


                     "(a) the institution of suits or continuation of pending suits or proceedings against the corporate
                     debtor  including  execution  of  any  judgment,  decree  or  order  in  any  court  of  law,  tribunal,

                     arbitration panel or other authority;






                                                                                                          793
   788   789   790   791   792   793   794   795   796   797   798