Page 397 - America's Failure to Perceive the PKK

The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex
structure, and random effects can only harm it. The American
geneticist B. G. Ranganathan explains this as follows:
First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mutations
are harmful since they are random, rather than orderly changes in the struc-
ture of genes; any random change in a highly ordered system will be for the

worse, not for the better. For example, if an earthquake were to shake a
highly ordered structure such as a building, there would be a random
change in the framework of the building which, in all probability,
would not be an improvement. (B. G. Ranganathan, Origins?, Pennsylva-
nia: The Banner of Truth Trust, 1988, p. 7.)

Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which is useful, that is,
which is observed to develop the genetic code, has been observed so
far. All mutations have proved to be harmful. It was understood that
mutation, which is presented as an "evolutionary mechanism," is
actually a genetic occurrence that harms living things, and leaves
them disabled. (The most common effect of mutation on human
beings is cancer.) Of course, a destructive mechanism cannot be an
"evolutionary mechanism." Natural selection, on the other hand, "can

do nothing by itself," as Darwin also accepted. This fact shows us that
there is no "evolutionary mechanism" in nature. Since no evolution-
ary mechanism exists, no such imaginary process called "evolution"
could have taken place.

T The Fossil Record: No Sign of

Intermediate Forms

The clearest evidence that the scenario suggested by the theory of
evolution did not take place is the fossil record.

According to the unscientific supposition of this theory, every
living species has sprung from a predecessor. A previously existing
species turned into something else over time and all species have

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya) 395