Page 324 - Atlas of Creation Volume 3
P. 324

SUMAC LEAF



                     Age: 50 million years

                     Period: Eocene

                     Location: Green River Formation, Utah, USA

                     The fossil findings that most clearly refute the idea of plant evolution are those
                     belonging to flowering plants. These angiosperms—to give them their biologi-
                     cal definition—are divided into 43 separate families, each one of which
                     emerges suddenly in the fossil record with no trace of any primitive "interme-
                     diate form" behind it.

                     This fact was realized in the 19th century, and Darwin described the origin of
                     angiosperms as "an abominable mystery". In his book  Palaeobiology of
                     Angiosperm Origins, the evolutionist paleobotanist Norman F. Hughes makes
                     the following admission:

                          ". . . the failure to find a satisfactory explanation has persisted, and many botanists

                          have concluded that the problem is not capable of solution, by use of fossil evi-
                          dence." (N. F. Hughes, Palaeobiology of Angiosperm Origins: Problems of Mesozoic Seed-
                          Plant Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, pp. 1-2))

                     This admission means that no fossil capable of being represented as proof of

                     plant evolution has been found. And neither is it possible for any to be discov-
                     ered in the future. As the 50-million-year-old sumac fossil pictured here shows,
                     plants did not evolve, but were created.





                322 Atlas of Creation Vol. 3
   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329