Page 122 - Confessions of the Evolutionists
P. 122

120              CONFESSIONS OF THE EVOLUTIONISTS




                   The Timesonline web site carried the following criticism:

                   Attenborough... was just one element of the MEDIA CIRCUS turning Ida
                   into humanity’s newest and best link with its ancient past.

                   Such finds are usually unveiled to the world through the sober pages of
                   an academic journal, but for Ida nothing less than a glittering press con-
                   ference at the American Museum of Natural History in New York would
                   do. Later the scientists who studied Ida outlined the details of their re-
                   search. Their pronouncements were just as extravagant. 310
                   Of course all Darwinists are well aware that Ida is not an intermedi-
              ate form, but rather a perfect living fossil. Contrary to all the speculation,

              Ida is a flawless life form that lived in a perfect manner some 47 milion
              years ago. The fossil has been 95% preserved, making it possible to study
              all its details, but it has NOT ONE STRUCTURE EXHIBITING INTER-
              MEDIATE FORM CHARACTERISTICS. This extraordinary finding IS

              PROOF OF THE FACT OF CREATION.


                   Evolutionists’ Confessions Regarding Australopithecus
                   Sediba
                   This fossil, discovered in 2008 in the Malapa cave in South Africa,

              consisted of components belonging to two living things. Darwinists al-
              leged that these “represented a complete skeleton.” But the fact is that
              these fossils consisted of a single skull and a few bones belonging to two
              living things. To put it more clearly, there was no complete skeleton of the
              kind alleged by Darwinists. But for Darwinists, who have no hesitations

              over producing wide-ranging reconstructions of a fictitious life form in a
              social setting on the basis of a single little finger, the amount of bones
              found was quite sufficient to engage in plentiful conjecture.
                   Darwinists, who are as yet unable to account for a single protein,
              claimed that this fossil was supposedly “our forebear.” But these two liv-
              ing fossils, with their height of just 1 meter, a skull volume of 420-450cc

              (much smaller than the 1200-1600cc skull volume of modern humans),
   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127