Page 46 - A Historical Lie: The Stone Age

A HISTORICAL LIE: THE STONE AGE

this and also collect edible fruits and nuts and roots. 2
This description, right down to the tiniest detail, is based on no
scientific findings whatsoever, but solely on its author's imagination.
Evolutionists, who dress up similar tales with various scientific
terms, base all their details on the basis of a few pieces of bone.
(Actually, these fossils demonstrate that no evolutionary process
ever took place—the exact opposite of what evolutionists claim!)
Obviously, bone fragments cannot provide any definite information
as to whatever emotions inspired people in very ancient times, what
their daily lives were like, or how they divided work amongst them-
selves.
However, the tale of human evolution is enriched with count-
less such imaginary scenarios and illustrations, and widely used by
evolutionists. Unable to rid themselves of this dogma of evolution
since the theory was first put forward, they have produced differing
versions of the scenario above. Yet their intention is not to elucidate,
but to wield indoctrination and propaganda to convince people that
primitive man once really existed.
Many evolutionists seek to prove their claims by producing
such scenarios, even in the absence of any supporting evidence. Yet
every new finding, when interpreted in an biased manner, very
clearly reveals to them certain facts, one of which is this: Man has

been Man since the day he came into existence. Such attributes as in-
telligence and artistic ability have been the same in all periods of his-
tory. Peoples who lived in the past were not primitive, half-human
half-animal creatures, as evolutionists would have us believe. They
were thinking, speaking human beings, just like us, who produced
works of art and developed cultural and ethical structures. As we'll
shortly see, archaeological and paleontological findings prove this
clearly and incontrovertibly.

44