Page 560 - Atlas der Schöpfung 3

ANMERKUNGEN 42. John Whitfield, “Oldest member of human family found”, Nature, July 11,
2002.
1. Søren Løvtrup , Darwinism: The Refutation of A Myth, New York: Croom Helm, 43. “Face of Yesterday: Henry Gee on the dramatic discovery of a seven-million-
1987, S. 422. year-old hominid,” The Guardian, July 11, 2002.
2. Richard Leakey, The Making of Mankind, London: Michael Joseph Limited, 44. Henry Gee, In Search of Deep Time, S. 5.
1981, S. 43. 45. Ebd., S. 32.
3. David Pilbeam, American Scientist, Volumen 66, Mai-Juni, 1978, S. 379. 46. F. Clark Howell, Thoughts on the Study and Interpretation of the Human Fossil
4. Jonathan Wells earned a doctorate at Yale University, and another for molecu- Record, S. 1.
lar and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley. He is also continuing 47. Tom Abate, San Francisco Chronicle, Februar 19, 2001.
his research on Darwinism at the Discovery Institute in Seattle. 48. Encyclopædia Britannica, “Modern Materialism.”
5. Some readers may find it odd to see evolution described as a religion, although 49. Werner Gitt, In the Beginning Was Information, CLV, Bielefeld, Germany,
this is actually most accurate. Any religion expresses basic principles that a per- Seiten 107-141.
son believes in and which shape his perspective on life. In imposing a materialist 50. George C. Williams, The Third Culture: Beyond the Scientific Revolution, (ed.
perspective, the theory of evolution is based not on science, but on faith. Among John Brockman), New York: Simon & Schuster, 1995, Seiten 42-43.
those who have described this theory as a religion are such evolutionists as Julian 51. Phillip Johnson’s Weekly Wedge Update, “DNA Demoted,” April 30, 2001,
Huxley and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. http://www.arn.org/docs/pjweekly/pj_weekly_010430.htm.
6. Benjamin D. Wiker, “Does Science Point to God? Part II: The Christian Critics”, 52. Ebd.
The Crisis Magazine, July-August 2003, 53. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species & The Descent of Man, New York: The
http://www.crisismagazine.com/julaug2003/feature1.htm. Modern Library, S. 398.
7. Francis Darwin, The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Volumen 2, Charles 54. Charles Darwin, “Letter to Asa Gray,” September 10, 1860, in Francis Darwin
Darwin to J.D. Hooker, Down [March 29, 1863]. (ed.), The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, Volumen II (New York: D. Appleton
8. “The Crucible of Life,” Earth, Februar 1998. and Company, 1896), S. 131.
9. “The Rise of Life on Earth,” National Geographic, March 1998. 55. “Haeckel’s Fraudulent Charts”; http://www.pathlights.com/ce_encyclope-
10. Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, Science or Myth, Why Much of What We dia/17rec03.html.
Teach About Evolution is Wrong, Washington, DC, Regnery Publishing, 2000, S. 56. L. Rutimeyer, “Referate,” Archiv fur Anthropologie, 1868.
21. 57. Francis Hitching, The Neck of the Giraffe: Where Darwin Went Wrong, New
11. Jeremy Rifkin, Algeny: A New World, Istanbul: Ufuk Kitaplari, 2001, S. 133. York: Ticknor and Fields 1982, S. 204.
12. Paul Davies, C.W. [renowned physicist] & Adams Phillip [journalist], More Big 58. Elizabeth Pennisi, “Haeckel’s Embryos: Fraud Rediscovered,” Science,
Questions, ABC Books: Sydney, Australia, 1998, Seiten 53-54, 47-48, 48. September 5, 1997. (emphasis added)
13. Michael J. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box; The Biochemical Challenge to 59. Ebd. (emphasis added)
Evolution, The Free Press, 1996, S. x. 60. Ebd.
14. Ebd., Seiten 4-5. 61. Ken McNamara, “Embryos and Evolution,” New Scientist, Volumen 12416,
15. Gerald L. Schroeder, The Hidden Face of God, The Free Press, New York, Oktober 16, 1999. (emphasis added)
2001, S. 62. 62. Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, S. 84.
16. Michael J. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box, S.5. 63. Ebd., S. 85.
17. W. R. Bird, The Origin of Species Revisited, Nashville: Thomas Nelson Co., 64. Ebd., S. 86.
1991, S. 325. 65. Charles Darwin, “Letter to Asa Gray,” September 10, 1860, in Francis Darwin
18. The New Encyclopedia Britannica, Chicago, 1993. (ed.), The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin , Volumen II, S. 131.
19. Ebd. 66. For a demolition of Dawkins’ thesis of the “blind watchmaker” see Lee
20. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, New Spetner, Not By Chance: Shattering the Modern Theory of Evolution, Judaica
York: The Modern Library, S. 234. Press, 1997; Michael J. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to
21. Alan Feduccia, The Origin and Evolution of Birds, Yale University Press, 1999, Evolution, The Free Press, 1996; Phillip E. Johnson, Darwin on Trial, Zweite
S. 81. Ausgabe, InterVarsity Press, 1993.
22. Niles Eldredge, and Ian Tattersall, The Myths of Human Evolution, Columbia 67. Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, London: Penguin Books, 1986,
University Press, 1982, Seiten 45-46. (emphasis added) Seiten 93-94.
23. C.P. Hickman [Professor Emeritus of Biology at Washington and Lee 68. Michael Denton, “The Inverted Retina: Maladaptation or Pre-adaptation?,”
University in Lexington], L.S. Roberts [Professor Emeritus of Biology at Texas Origins & Design, 19:2, Issue 37, 1999.
Tech University], and F.M. Hickman, 1988, Integrated Principles of Zoology, Times 69. Ebd.
Mirror/Moseby College Publishing, St. Louis, MO. 939 S. 866. 70. G.L. Walls, The Vertebrate Eye, New York: Hafner Publishing Company, 1963,
24. T. S. Kemp, Fossils and Evolution, Oxford University Press, 1999, S. 246. S. 652.
25. David Berlinksi, Commentary, September 1996, S. 28. 71. Michael Denton, “The Inverted Retina: Maladaptation or Pre-adaptation?,”
26. Gerald Schroeder, Evolution: Rationality vs. Randomness, http://www.gerald- Origins & Design, 19:2, Issue 37, 1999.
schroeder.com/evolution.html. 72. T.J. McIlwain, An Introduction to the Biology of Vision, Cambridge: Cambridge
27. Stephen J. Gould, “An Asteroid to Die For,” Discover, Oktober 1989, S. 65. University Press, 1996, S. 14.
28. Gregory A. Wray, “The Grand Scheme of Life,” Review of The Crucible 73. Michael Denton, “The Inverted Retina: Maladaptation or Pre-adaptation?,”,
Creation: The Burgess Shale and the Rise of Animals by Simon Conway Morris, Origins & Design, 19:2, Issue 37, 1999.
Trends in Genetics, Februar 1999, Volumen 15, no. 2. 74. Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, III. ed. Chapter 13: “Mutual Affinities of
29. Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, S. 31. Organic Beings: Morphology: Embryology: Rudimentary Organs.”
30. Niles Eldredge, Ian Tattersall, The Myths of Human Evolution, Seiten 126-127. 75. www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral
31. Richard C. Lewontin, Human Diversity, Scientific American Library: New York /Lab/6562/evolution/designgonebad.html.
NY, 1995, S. 163. 76. S. R. Scadding, “Do ‘Vestigial Organs’ Provide Evidence for Evolution?,”
32. Henry Gee, In Search of Deep Time: Beyond the Fossil Record to a New Evolutionary Theory, Volumen 5, Mai, 1981, S. 173.
History of Life, New York: The Free Press, 1999, Seiten 116-117. 77. Paul A. Nelson, “Jettison the Arguments, or the Rule? The Place of Darwinian
33. Bernard Wood, Mark Collard, “The Human Genus,” Science, Volumen 284, Theological Themata in Evolutionary Reasoning,” Access Research Network,
No 5411, April 2, 1999, Seiten 65-7. 1988, http://www.arn.org/docs/nelson/pn_jettison.html.
34. Pat Shipman, “Doubting Dmanisi,” American Scientist, November- December 78. George Schaller, H. Jinchu, S. Wenshi, and Z. Jing, The Giant Pandas of
2000, S. 491. Wolong (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), 4; 58. (emphasis added)
35. Roger Lewin, Bones of Contention, The University of Chicago Press, S. 312. 79. “Role of the giant panda’s ‘pseudo-thumb,” Nature, Volumen 397, Januar 28,
36. John R. Durant, “The Myth of Human Evolution,” New Universities Quarterly 1999, Seiten 309-310.
35. (1981), Seiten 425-438. 80. Ebd.
37. G. A. Clark and C. M. Willermet (eds.), Conceptual Issues in Modern Human 81. Gretchen Vogel, “Objection #2: Why Sequence the Junk?,” Science, Februar
Origins Research, New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1997, S. 76. 16, 2001.
38. Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution, S. 225. 82. Wojciech Makalowski, “Not Junk After All,” Science, Volumen 300, Number
39. Paul S. Taylor, Origins Answer Book, Eden Communications, 1995, S. 35. 5623, Mai 23, 2003.
40. John Whitfield, “Oldest member of human family found,” Nature, July 11, 83. http://www.arn.org/docs/odesign
2002. /od182/ls182.htm#anchor569108.
41. D.L. Parsell, “Skull Fossil From Chad Forces Rethinking of Human Origins,” 84. “Does nonsense DNA speak its own dialect?,” Science News, Volumen 164,
National Geographic News, July 10, 2002. December 24, 1994.

558 Atlas der Schöpfung, Band III