Page 31 - ATENEO SERVED 2020 E-BOOK_Neat
P. 31

Ateneo Science Educators and Researchers in Virtual
         Engagement (SERVE) 2020 Ateneo de Manila University
         School of Science and Engineering
         MS Science Education  Program of Biology Department









                      What Do Environmental Literacy, Environmental Locus of Control, and Future
                                         Orientation of STEM Students Tell Us?

                                              a*
                                                                     b
                    Princes Raymunda G. Gatan , Dr. Rosanelia T. Yangco , and Dr. Sheryl Lyn C. Monterola b
                   a
                                                                                      b
                      University of the Philippines Institute for Science and Mathematics Education Development  College of Education,
                               University of the Philippines * Corresponding author’s email: pggatan@up.edu.ph


                                                        ABSTRACT


            Most environmental problems in the Philippines are anthropogenic, hence, it is of great importance that
            STEM students, the decision makers and key-players of society someday, to bring about great moves toward
            environmental conservation in the future. Thus, it would be helpful to gauge in advance not only the status
            of  their  environmental  literacy  but  also  to  find  out  whether  they  believe  that  their  actions  can  create
            environmental impacts, and if they are inclined to consider future consequences of their actions/decisions.
            There  were  three  instruments  used  to  measure  the  environmental  locus  of  control  (ELOC),  future
            orientation (FO), and environmental literacy (EL) of STEM students (N=512). The ELOC revealed a mean of
            6.22 for the Recycling Attitudes, the highest among four dimensions, followed by Green Consumer (M=5.95),
            Activism  (M=5.74),  and  Advocate  (M=5.54).  This  means  that  most  STEM  students  believed  that  through
            recycling, they could improve or mitigate the worsening condition of the environment. Meanwhile, students’
            inclination to FO showed that students considered more distant outcomes or consequences of their actions
            (M=3.10) rather than focusing on meeting their immediate needs (M=2.41). The EL results showed a low rate
            of 56.26%.
            The  interrelationships  among  the  LOC,  FO,  and  EL  all  yielded  significant,  weak  correlational  results.  The
            weak relationships between FO and EL, and LOC and FO, and a negative relationship between LOC and EL,
            are  deviations  from  most  extant  research.  The  STEM  students’  mindset,  economic  considerations,  and
            personal benefit among others, might have contributed to these results.
            The baseline data from this study compel curriculum material developers and writers to continuously exert
            more effort in improving the STEM students’ EL even in the new normal setting. It is also hoped that more
            studies would embark on this area to contribute to this pioneering attempt in deepening the analysis of
            STEM students’ EL, ELOC, and FO.


            Keywords:  environmental  education;  environmental  literacy;  environmental  locus  of  control;  future  orientation;
            STEM students














                                                            31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36