Page 128 - Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017 V1.3
P. 128

Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017                    128



                          AMRITSAR - 132001
                          PUNJAB
                          3.  THE  ZONAL  MANAGER,  LIFE  INSUR-
                       ENCEC O OF INDIA,
                          NORHERN     ZONAL  OFFICE,  JEEVAN
                       BHARTI, CANNOUGHT CIRCUS
                          NEW DELHI - 110001


                         BE-
                       FORE:
                                   HON'BLE DR. B.C. GUPTA,PRESIDING MEMBER
                                   HON'BLE MR. DR. S.M. KANTIKAR,MEMBER

                         For   the   Peti-  Mr. Ankur Bansal, Advocate
                       tioner :          and

                                            Mr.  Vipul  Aggarwal,  Advo-
                                         cate

                         For  the  Respon-  Ms.  Manisha  Tyagi,  Ad-
                       dent :            vocate


                       Dated : 21 Feb 2017
                         ORDER
                          DR. S. M. KANTIKAR, MEMBER

                          1.       This revision petition has been filed under Section 21(b) of the Consumer
                       Protection Act, 1986  against the impugned order dated 27.11.2012 passed by Punjab
                       State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Chandigarh in first appeal No. 1281
                       of 2008.
                          2.       The relevant brief facts to dispose of this revision petition are that the peti-
                       tioner/complainant, Smt. Ranvir alias Ranbir Kaur‘s husband Mr. Kamaljit Singh took
                       an insurance policy covering death claim of Rs. 2 lakh from the LIC of India/the OP
                       on 28.4.2002.  The insured was hale and hearty, not suffering from any disease but
                       unfortunately, he expired on 12.1.2004 during the hospitalization in Munni Lal Cho-
                       pra Hospital, Amritsar.  The wife as a nominee of the deceased life assured (DLA)
                       filed a claim with the OP/LIC but it was repudiated on the ground that deceased life
                       assured (DLA) was suffering from chronic liver disease for about 1 ½ years prior to
                       his death.  He intentionally concealed it while taking the policy.     Hence, against the
                       unjust repudiation of claim, the complainant filed a complaint before the District Fo-
                       rum, Gurdaspur.
                          3.       The  District  Forum  after  considering  the  pleadings  and  evidence  allowed
                       the complaint and directed the OP to pay insured sum alongwith interest from the date




                                                       INDEX
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133