Page 49 - test_constitution 100

ART. 16 THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA 49
The appropriate allocation of marks for interview, where selection is to be made by written test as well as by interview, would depend upon the nature of post and no straight jacket formula can be laid down. (Bishnu Biswas v Union of India, AIR 2014 SC 1570 : (2014)5 SCC 774).
A person whose name appears in the select list does not acquire any indefeasible right of appointment. (State of Orissa v Rajkishore Nanda, AIR 2010 SC 2100 : (2010)6 SCC 777).
Mere inclusion of the name of a candidate in the merit list does not confer right on him to be selected/appointed. (Shankarsan Dash v Union of India, AIR 1991 SC 1612 : (1991)3 SCC 47 : 1991 AIR SCW 1583).
Select list life - Raj Rishi Mehra v State of Punjab, AIR 2013 SC 3580 : (2013)12 SCC 243.
Select list has a limited life. (Union of India v Haralal Das, 1999 SCC (L&S) 792).
Panel was prepared having indefinite life. Held, the panel did not create any right in the empanelled candidates. (Babita Prasad v State of Bihar, 1993 Supp. (3) SCC 268).
Select list - Life one year cannot be extended repeatedly. (State of Orissa v Sasmita Pattnaik, AIR 2017 SC 1418).
Select list candidate(s) have no vested right to appointment (Director, SCTI for Medical Science and Technology v M. Pushkaran, AIR 2008 SC 559 : (2008)1 SCC 448).
PCS (J) - Select list - Non-joining by candidates from the list. (Kulwinder Pal Singh v State of Punjab, AIR 2016 SC 2281 : (2016)6 SCC 532).
A select list prepared by the experts (Selection Committee) cannot be re-arranged by the Court on the basis of its own valuation. (University of Jammu v T.S. Khan, AIR 2011 SC 1788 : (2011)14 SCC 667).
Life of Select list - Ordinarily, a select list remains valid for a period of one year. (Girdhar Kumar Dadhich v State of Rajasthan, AIR 2009 SC 1899 : (2009)2 SCC 706).
Mere inclusion of a candidate’s name in the selection list gave him no right, and if there was no right, there could be no occasion to maintain a writ petition for enforcement of a non-existing right. (Union of India v Kali Dass Batish, AIR 2006 SC 789 : (2006)1 SCC 779).
Select list prepared by the Public Service Commission can be used to fill up the notified vacancies and not future vacancies. (Mukul Saikia v State of Assam, AIR 2009 SC 747 : (2009)1 SCC 386).
Wait list commences when candidates in select list have not joined. (State of J&K v Sat Pal, AIR 2013 SC 1258 : (2013)11 SCC 737).
Rajathan State and Subordinate Services (Direct Recruitment by Combined Competitive Examination Rules (1999), Rule 20(2)
When a selected candidate does not join, the resultant vacancy shall be treated as fresh vacancy, and cannot be offered to the claimant. (State of Rajasthan v Kiran Meen, AIR 2017 SC 2432).
Compassionate appointments - In the absence of scheme compassionate appointment cannot be given. (National Institute of Technology v Niraj Kumar Singh, AIR 2007 SC 1155 : (2007)2 SCC 481).
A KLJ PUBLICATION