Page 18 - Civil Engineering Project Management, Fourth Edition
P. 18

The development of construction procedures
                                                                                                3
                            The great majority of all civil engineering projects undertaken by British
                          engineers in the UK and elsewhere have been, and still are, constructed
                          satisfactorily under the ICE or FIDIC Conditions. However, other methods
                          are also commonly used to meet special requirements as shown below, and
                          the ICE and FIDIC have developed other standard forms for such purposes
                          (see Chapter 4).
                          1.3 Other long-standing procedures

                          Lump sum construction contracts


                          Under the standard ICE or FIDIC Conditions, the financial outcome of a pro-
                          ject is not absolutely fixed, because the promoter has to pay for any extra work
                          caused by conditions ‘which an experienced contractor could not have fore-
                          seen’. This does not suit some promoters who wish to be certain what an
                          intended project will cost, so ‘fixed price’ contracts came into use, often for
                          a lump sum. Under them the construction contractor has to take all risks, such
                          as meeting unexpected ground conditions. Such fixed price contracts can be
                          satisfactory for both promoter and contractor for relatively simple, easily
                          defined works involving little below-ground work.
                            Naturally a contractor’s price for undertaking a contract for a fixed sum is
                          higher than for a bill-of-quantities contract for the same work under which he
                          is paid by measure of the work he is required to do. But this can suit a pro-
                          moter who prefers to be certain about his financial commitment and where
                          the works he requires can be well defined in advance. However, if the pos-
                          sible risks on the contractor appear high due to many imponderables – such as
                          the works being large or complicated, or ground conditions being uncertain –
                          then the extra charge made by the contractor for shouldering the risks may be
                          high. Should the promoter require amendments as construction proceeds,
                          then these will also prove expensive.


                          Cost reimbursement contracts


                          These contracts have been in use for many years on projects which involve
                          unforeseeable amounts or kinds of work – such as the repair of a dam or col-
                          lapsed tunnel, or repair of sea defences. Payment to the contractor is usually on
                          the basis of: (i) direct costs of materials, labour and plant used on the site; plus
                          (ii) a percentage addition for overhead costs; plus (iii) a fixed fee, or further
                          percentage on for profit. Often a cost reimbursement contract for specialist
                          work is negotiated with a suitably experienced contractor. If competitive bid-
                          ding is required this would be based on comparison of contractors’ quotations
                          for overheads and profit. The advantage is that the promoter’s engineer in
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23