Page 14 - GP Fall Final 2017
P. 14

2.8, 3.4 and 3.8mm drills at 1280 rpm. A  sional.  The buccal  gingival  aspect  of the  (RelyX) (3M, St. Paul, MN)(Figure 13).
        4.7x13mm SBM tapered  Legacy  1 (Im-  crown was undercontoured.
        plant  Direct,  Carlsbad, CA) implant  was
        manually placed with a straight driver, fix-  Guided bone regeneration was performed
        ture mount and 2.5mm hex tool (Figure 6).  consisting of a mixture of mineralized irra-
                                             diated bone allograph, PRP and PRF. The
                                             mixture  was placed in the “gap” located
                                             between the socket walls and the implant
                                             surface. The grafting mixture was packed
                                             and covered coronal to the abutment/im-
                                             plant interface with various size pluggers
                                             (Figure 10).                         Figure 13. Final prosthesis: all-ceramic crown.

        Figure 6. Implant 4.7 x 13mm.                                             Discussion
                                                                                  Immediate  implant  placement  and provi-
        A torque wrench set at 35 Newton centi-                                   sionalization (IIPP) is recognized as a min-
        meters  was applied  to the implant  body                                 imally  invasive  approach  for replacing  a
        1mm coronal to final placement to evaluate                                non-restorable tooth. This concept deviates
        the degree of fixation (Figure 7). A torque                               from a delayed  approach  where a stress-
        value greater than 35 Newton centimeters                                  free loading period is observed during a
        was achieved and the implant was seated                                   three  to six month osseointegration  peri-
        completely.                                                               od. Studies have supported the concept of
                                                                                    5
                                             Figure 10. Healing collar 4.7x3mm.   IIPP when comparing  histology, survival
                                             The provisional was cemented with a tem-  rates,  recession and patient  acceptance  to
                                             porary  cement.  The  occlusion  was mod-  early, delayed or staged approaches. IIPP
                                                                                                               6-8
                                             ified  to  eliminate  all  contacts  in  centric  research demonstrates  high success rates
                                             occlusion, protrusion and excursions. The  based on stable  crestal  bone levels  while
                                             incisal edge was shortened in comparison  other studies exhibit bone gain. 9-11  Studies
                                             to the adjacent tooth (Figure 11).   exhibit better tissue stability and lower lev-
                                                                                  els  of recession around  implants restored
                                                                                  with a provisional. 12-14  This finding may be
        Figure 7. Torque wrench.                                                  in part due to less connections/disconnec-
        A 4.7 transfer pin was screwed into the im-                               tions of component parts which can impair
        plant body and a periapical radiograph tak-                               the mucosal barrier promoting apicaliza-
        en (Figure 8). Orthodontic wax was placed                                 tion of the junctional epithelium.
                                                                                                            15
        into the screw access hole and a polyvinyl-
        siloxane  (Imprint III, 3M, St. Paul,  MN)                                The clinical and diagnostic evaluation  is
        impression taken.                                                         essential  when determining  if IIPP will
                                                                                  produce a successful outcome. Proper di-
                                             Figure 11. Provisional crown.        agnosis and understanding of the biologi-
                                             A commercial laboratory poured the im-  cal and periodontal variables of the failing
                                             plant impression and mounted the case.  dentition and their response to surgical and
                                             A zirconium  abutment  was designed  and  prosthetic  procedures are the essence of
                                             manufactured with a buccal margin placed  predictability.  A class I socket classifica-
                                                                                             16
                                             1.5mm coronal to the abutment-implant in-  tion comprising of an intact  buccal plate
                                             terface. An orientation jig was fabricated to  and ideal soft tissue contour provides for
                                             assist in the alignment of the internal hex  the best anatomical foundation for the exe-
                                             orientation. An all-ceramic  restoration  (e.  cution of IIPP procedures.
        Figure 8. Impression transfer (4.7mm).  max) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, NY) was
        A temporary titanium abutment was placed  fabricated.                     The  clinical  evaluation  includes  a  visual
        into the implant body and modified in three                               inspection of the gingival margins of ad-
        dimensions to develop interocclusal clear-  After a three month osseointegration pe-  jacent  teeth,  biotype  and smile  line.  The
        ance and crown fabrication. The temporary  riod, the final placement of the abutment/  presence of a high smile line with uneven
        abutment screw was torqued to 20 Newton  crown procedure  was performed.  After  gingival margins in a thin biotype patient
        centimeters (Figure 9).              removal of the temporary crown and abut-  is considered a negative prognostic factor.
                                             ment,  the  final  zirconium  abutment  was
        An acrylic crown shell with self-curing                                   Bone sounding is performed to determine
        acrylic was utilized to fabricate the provi-           placed. A  periapical   the presence and location  of the buccal
                                                               radiograph was tak-  plate of bone. The presence of the buccal
                                                               en and the abutment   plate of bone is an essential parameter for
                                                               screw torqued  down  stable soft tissue. Studies have demonstrat-
                                                               to 30 Newton centi-  ed that when the buccal plate is located ≤
                                                               meters (Figure 12).  3mm from the facial gingival margin then
                                                               The final all-ceramic  <1mm  recession  occurs  within  the  first
                                                                                      17
                                                               crown (e.max)  was   year.  A radiographic evaluation of the sur-
                                             Figure 12. Periapical                gical site provides clinical insight prior to
                                             radiograph of final   bonded in with a res-
          Figure 9. Titanium abutment.       zirconium abutment.  in bonded material   www.nysagd.org l Fall 2017 l GP 13
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19