Page 288 - pwc-lease-accounting-guide_Neat
P. 288

Effective date and transition






                       If a lessee elects to not adjust the comparative periods, we believe the lessee should present their
                       comparative periods as they had before adopting ASC 842. We believe that the Board’s intent in
                       providing the optional transition method was to allow entities to continue to report leases for the
                       comparative period as they had under ASC 840.


           10.4.1.3    Impairment


                       At transition, a lessee should consider whether adjustments are needed for any impairment when
                       determining the amount of the right-of-use asset to record.

                       We believe that the FASB did not intend for lessees to adjust prior period impairment measurements
                       or allocations to an asset group under ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment upon adoption of the
                       leases standard. If an asset group that includes an operating lease had been impaired under current
                       GAAP, an allocation of the prior period asset group impairment should not be included in the
                       measurement of the operating lease right-of-use asset upon adoption of the leases standard. Instead, a
                       right-of-use asset for a lessee’s operating lease should be assessed for impairment under current
                       GAAP, for example, ASC 420, Exit or disposal cost obligations (if the entity has ceased use of the
                       leased asset), or ASC 840 (if the lessee subleased the underlying leased asset at a loss) during the look-
                       back period. The impairment provisions of ASC 360 would apply only on or after the effective date of
                       the new standard, unless the scenario in LG Question 10-9 applies.


                       Question 10-9

                       If previous impairments under ASC 360 in excess of the carrying value of long-lived assets within the
                       asset group were identified prior to the effective date, but were not able to be expensed because the
                       assets cannot be written down below fair value (an “unrecognized impairment”), is a lessee required to
                       expense any additional impairment resulting from the recognition of the right-of-use asset as of the
                       effective date?


                       PwC response
                       We believe that an “unrecognized impairment” should be recorded at the date that the right-of-use
                       asset is initially recognized on the balance sheet. Therefore, if a reporting entity elects not to adjust
                       comparative periods, the impairment should be recorded as an equity adjustment at adoption since
                       the impairment is first recorded at the date of initial application (e.g., January 1, 2019 for a calendar
                       year-end public business entity).

           10.4.1.4    Foreign currency

                       The transition guidance in the leases standard does not address how to treat the effects of foreign
                       exchange rates in a lease that is denominated in a currency other than a reporting entity’s functional
                       currency. As a result, certain questions have arisen.













                                                                                                            10-16
   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293