Page 137 - International guidelines for groin hernia management
P. 137
Hernia
biomaterial. Hernia 16(1):9–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029- 387. Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI et al (1960) Long-term
011-0868-z complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional
373. Deeken CR, Abdo MS, Frisella MM, Matthews BD (2011) hernias. Arch Surg 133:378–382
Physicomechanical evaluation of polypropylene, polyester, and 388. Kuehnert N, Kraemer NA, Otto J et al (2012) In vivo MRI
polytetrafluoroethylene meshes for inguinal hernia repair. J Am visualization of mesh shrinkage using surgical implants loaded
Coll Surg 212(1):68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg. with superparamagnetic iron oxides. Surg Endosc Other Interv
2010.09.012 Tech 26(5):1468–1475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-
374. Deeken CR, Thompson DM, Castile RM, Lake SP (2014) 2057-7
Biaxial analysis of synthetic scaffolds for hernia repair 389. Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Mu ¨ller C et al (2007) Improving out-
demonstrates variability in mechanical anisotropy, non-linearity comes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes—a comparison
and hysteresis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 38:6–16. of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014.06.001 the literature. World J Surg 31:234–244
375. Maurer MM, Ro ¨hrnbaue B, Feola A, Deprest J, Mazza E (2014) 390. Weyhe D, Schmitz I, Belyaev O et al (2006) Experimental
Mechanical biocompatibility of prosthetic meshes: a compre- comparison of monofile light and heavy polypropylene meshes:
hensive protocol for mechanical characterization. J Mech Behav less weight does not mean less biological response. World J
Biomed Mater 40:42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2014. Surg 30(8):1586–1591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-
08.005 0601-0
376. Sahoo S, DeLozier KR, Erdemir A, Derwin KA (2015) Clini- 391. Nikkolo C, Murruste M, Vaasna T, Seepter H, Tikk T, Lepner U
cally relevant mechanical testing of hernia graft constructs. (2012) Three-year results of randomised clinical trial comparing
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 41:117–118. https://doi.org/10. lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernio-
1016/j.jmbbm.2014.10.011 plasty. Hernia 16(5):555–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-
377. Klinge U, Prescher A, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V (1997) 012-0951-0
Entstehung und pathophysiologie der bauchwanddefekte. Chir- 392. Sadowski B, Rodriguez J, Symmonds R et al (2011) Comparison
urg 68(4):293–303 of polypropylene versus polyester mesh in the Lichtenstein
378. Klosterhalfen B, Junge K, Klinge U (2005) The lightweight and hernia repair with respect to chronic pain and discomfort. Hernia
large porous mesh concept for hernia repair. Expert Rev Med 15:643–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-011-0841-x
Devices 2(1):103–117. https://doi.org/10.1586/17434440.2.1. 393. Chowbey PK, Garg N, Sharma A et al (2010) Prospective ran-
103 domized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavy-
379. Saberski ER, Orenstein SB, Novitsky YW (2011) Anisotropic weight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal
evaluation of synthetic surgical meshes. Hernia 15(1):47–52. groin hernia repair. Surg Endosc 24(12):3073–3079. https://doi.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-010-0731-7 org/10.1007/s00464-010-1092-0
380. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J et al (1998) Modified mesh 394. Chui LB, Ng WT, Sze YS, Yuen KS, Wong YT, Kong CK
for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the (2010) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing
abdominal wall. Eur J Surg 164(12):951–960. https://doi.org/10. lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence
1080/110241598750005138 after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc Other
381. Weyhe D, Cobb W, Lecuivre J et al (2015) Large pore size and Interv Tech 24:2735–2738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-
controlled mesh elongation are relevant predictors for mesh 1036-8
integration quality and low shrinkage—systematic analysis of 395. Chen J, Lv Y, Shen Y, Liu S, Wang M (2010) A prospective
key parameters of meshes in a novel minipig hernia model. Int J comparison of preperitoneal tension-free open herniorrhaphy
Surg 22:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.717 with mesh plug herniorrhaphy for the treatment of femoral
382. Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U (2013) Retrieval study at 623 human hernias. Surgery 148(5):976–981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.
mesh explants made of polypropylene—impact of mesh class 2010.02.006
and indication for mesh removal on tissue reaction. J Biomed 396. Agarwal BB, Agarwal KA, Mahajan KC (2009) Prospective
Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 101(8):1393–1399. https://doi. double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy-
org/10.1002/jbm.b.32958 and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal
383. Barone WR, Amini R, Maiti S, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD repair of inguinal hernia: early results. Surg Endosc Other Interv
(2015) The impact of boundary conditions on surface curvature Tech 23:242–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0188-2
of polypropylene mesh in response to uniaxial loading. 397. Koch A, Bringman S, Myrelid P, Smeds S, Kald A (2008)
J Biomech 48(9):1566–1574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech. Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-
2015.02.061 coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene
384. Feola A, Pal S, Moalli P, Maiti S, Abramowitch S (2014) mesh. Br J Surg 95:1226–1231. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6325
Varying degrees of nonlinear mechanical behavior arising from 398. Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, Smedberg S, Granlund H,
geometric differences of urogynecological meshes. J Biomech Heikkinen T-J (2006) Three-year results of a randomized clin-
47(11):2584–2589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.05. ical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in
027 Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia. Br J Surg
385. Feola A, Barone W, Moalli P, Abramowitch S (2013) Charac- 93(9):1056–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5403
terizing the ex vivo textile and structural properties of synthetic 399. Nienhuijs SW, van Oort I, Keemers-Gels ME, Strobbe LJ,
prolapse mesh products. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Rosman C (2005) Randomized trial comparing the Prolene
24(4):559–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1901-1 Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for
386. Shepherd JP, Feola AJ, Abramowitch SD, Moalli PA (2012) open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92:33–38
Uniaxial biomechanical properties of seven different vaginally 400. Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, Neufang T, Lorenz D (2004) Ran-
implanted meshes for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J domized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for
Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 23(5):613–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/ Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 91:44–48.
s00192-011-1616-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4387
401. Sanjay P, Harris D, Jones P, Woodward A (2006) Randomized
controlled trial comparing prolene hernia system and
123