Page 65 - Washington Nonprofit Handbook 2018 Edition
P. 65

If there is a procedure for amending the bylaws in both the articles and the bylaws,
               the  procedure  in  the  articles  must  be  followed.    Generally,  amendments  to  the
               bylaws  are  effective  with  board  approval  alone.    However,  it  is  common  for
               nonprofit  corporations  with  voting  members  to  require  approval  of  bylaw
               amendments by the members.  Even if a membership vote is not required, it is not
               unusual for the procedure for amending bylaws to call for a supermajority vote of
               the board or for special notice or meeting requirements.  In addition to amending
               the  bylaws,  the  board  may  also  repeal  one  or  more  of  the  bylaws  or  adopt  new
               bylaws.  Once adopted, the bylaws continue to govern the affairs of the corporation
               until the bylaws are either amended or repealed.


                  CHAPTER 19.  Sarbanes-Oxley  –  Document  Retention  and  Protections  for
                                  Whistleblowers

                       With  the  passage  of  the  Public  Company  Accounting  Reform  and  Investor
               Protection Act of 2002 (often referred to by the names of its principal sponsors as

               “Sarbanes-Oxley,”  or  “SOX”  for  short),  corporate  America  was  prompted  to  give
               more  attention  to  governance  and  financial  accountability.    This  law  focuses
               primarily  on  the  financial  affairs  of  publicly  traded  corporations.    Two  of  the
               provisions  of  Sarbanes-Oxley  have  very  broad  application,  though,  and  directly
               pertain to the operations of most nonprofit organizations.

               Preservation of Records


                       Title  VIII  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  (SOX)  extends  criminal  penalties  to
               anyone  who  “knowingly  alters…any  record…with  the  intent  to…obstruct…the
               investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any
               department or agency of the United States.”  (section 802).  Destroying or altering
               documents related to an IRS investigation of a nonprofit organization’s Form 990
               (see Chapter 35) is an example of the kind of behavior this section is designed to
               punish.  Nonprofit organizations may frequently be required to file other reports
               with federal agencies that  fall  within  the  scope of  this  section.   Adopting policies
               that guard against violating SOX is good business practice for any organization that
               files reports with the federal government.


                       Every  nonprofit  organization  should  preserve  the  documentation  used  to
               prepare any reports and, in particular, make clear to all volunteers and employees
               that documents cannot be destroyed or altered in any way if an investigation of the
               organization’s affairs are on the horizon or underway.









               WASHINGTON NONPROFIT HANDBOOK                -54-                                        2018
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70