Page 176 - EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.1A
P. 176

Pg: 176 - 6-Front 21-10-31

                    female (ginos). Yom Teruah (on Rosh Hashanah 29a, s.v.
                    tumtum) states that this is the opinion of the Yerushalmi.
                    The Pri Megadim (General Introduction 8) takes the view
                    that the meaning of the opinion [in the Mishnah] that an
                    androginos is a unique creation on its own, whose gender the
                    Sages left undetermined, is not that an androginos is possibly
                    a male and possibly a female, as is the view of Tosfos. (Yeva-
                    mos 82) Rather, according to this opinion the androginos is
                    akin to a completely separate gender which is neither male
                    nor female, yet which is still obligated in mitzvos because
                    women are also obligated, and [whatever his status] the
                    androginos is a Jew.

                       “According to the above, even a certain androginos can be
                    counted for a minyan because there is a compounded doubt:
                    Perhaps he is a male, like the R”Y and the Rosh. Even if he
                    is not completely a male, perhaps he is half male as the Raa-
                    vad maintains. The Torah’s command, ‘I shall be sanctified
                    among Bnei Yisrael’ (Vayikra 22: 32), [which is the source for
                    the requirement of ten male Jews for communal prayer] ap-
                    plies even to a person who is only partially a Yisrael. All are
                    thus unanimous that the androginos’s male side is obligated
                    in mitzvos because he is a Jew. We say in Chullin (79b) that
                    [mitzvos applying to] ‘a lamb’ apply even to an animal that is
                    only partially a lamb [i.e. a hybrid]. The Shach (Yoreh De’ah
                    16:17) writes that this principle that even a partial identity
                    imparts the same halachic character as a complete identity
                    applies everywhere. [Thus, even if an androginos is only a
                    partial male, he will have the same obligations as any other
                    Jewish male.] This apart, the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim
                    55,5) says that once a man has attained maturity in years we
                    do not need to check whether he has also attained physical
                    maturity [and he can be counted for a minyan on the basis of
                    his age alone]. The Magen Avraham writes (ibid.) that this
                    is because communal prayer is only a rabbinic obligation.
                    The Pri Megadim and the Levushei Srad explain that this

160  1  Medical-Halachic Responsa of Rav Zilberstein
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181