Page 36 - EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.1A
P. 36

Pg: 36 - 2-Front 21-10-31

         cannot be used as a basis for deriving practical rulings.4 According to
         this, we have no proof whatsoever that it will be permitted to violate
         a Torah prohibition, even if by doing so it means that many other
         violations will be avoided.

            The difficulties we raised with both of the approaches advanced
         by the Divrei Malkiel may be why the Achiezer decided (ibid. Vol.
         III 24:4) not to accept them as halachah but to rely instead on the
         She’ilas Yaavetz which we cited earlier in the third approach, in per-
         mitting a man who has been married for more than ten years without
         any children to emit sperm for testing.

            Now up to this point, we have been exploring the reasoning of
         those who permit the emission of semen for medical testing. Howev-
         er, it must be added that several leading poskim prohibit the emission
         of semen for infertility testing and the like. According to them, the
         above gemara in Yevamos refers specifically to permitting a kerus shuf-
         chah, as we shall explain.

            See the Sdei Chemed (in Pe’as Hasadeh, Asifas Dinim, Ma’areches
         Ishus, 3), who writes that it is incorrect to recommend that a person
         sin by doing something wrong for the sake of some possible benefit in
         regard to being able to sire children, when the physicians themselves
         are uncertain whether he can be healed. How can we ignore what is
         certain in order to embrace that which is doubtful?! At any rate in
         our case, where in the context of the physicians’ recommendations
         there are multiple doubts about the benefit of testing, even according
         to those poskim who are lenient for the sake of a mitzvah, there are
         no grounds for leniency and for permitting emission of semen by a
         married man who has been married for a number of years without
         children. This ruling is echoed by the Minchas Elazar at the begin-
         ning of the sefer Darkei Teshuvah, namely that one cannot consent to
         the testing of sperm for a couple that has no children because there is
         no benefit from the vast majority of [these] emissions of semen and
         they serve no purpose in attaining the desired goal of fulfilling the

           4.	 See our lengthy discussion of this topic earlier, siman 214 (s.v. ela sheyesh leha’ir)
                and ibid. Note 3.

20  1  Medical-Halachic Responsa of Rav Zilberstein
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41