Page 65 - Reading Job to Know God
P. 65

Let  me  provide  you  with  an  example  of  this  practice.  (Let  me  coin    a
           word) “Eliphasizing” – taking the foundation as Eliphaz did from his
           experiences. Someone gets up and gives a testimony. “Well, let  me tell
           you  about  the  day  I  got  saved.  I  cried  for  four  hours”.  And  some
           uninstructed person sitting in the audience says, “I did not cry when I got
           saved; maybe I did not mean it, perhaps I’m not really saved”. This often
           leads people astray. Someone says, “I saw so and so get healed after I
           fasted  and  prayed  all  night”.  So  then  somebody  hears  that  and  figures,
           “Well,  maybe  if  I  pray  all  night  God  will  answer  me.  Especially  if
           uninstructed  and  immature  Christians  hear  this.    They    will    feel
           compelled to duplicate that particular  experience. I think this is one of
           the great dangers of the testimony meeting.

           I used to love those meetings. But the more I hear them, the less I like
           them. The reason they have begun to bother me so much, is that they are
           often  too  experience-centered,  too  much  “Eliphasizing”.  Everything  is
           about what people felt or did. Colossians 2:18,

           “Stop letting anyone, in gratuitous humility and worship of angels,
           defraud you as an umpire, for such a one is taking his stand on the
           mere  visions  he  has  seen,  and  is  groundlessly  conceited  over  his
           sensuous mind”.
           If someone would stand up and say, “Here is the truth of God from the
           Bible, and here is how God did this in my life”. That would be wonderful
           because  they  would  be  illustrating  an  objective  principle  by  their
           subjective experience. A lot of time is wasted in self-analysis and self-
           interpretation.  Too  much  talk  about  your  own  experience,  dissipates
           spiritual energy. That is how Eliphaz based his arguments. What I have
           seen, what I have observed. I had an experience; I had a dream; I had a
           vision. And it did not satisfy Job, and Job told him so.
           Bildad comes along, and he chooses something else to base his on. Look
           at chapter 8:8 “Please inquire of past generations, and consider the
           things  searched  out  by  their  fathers.”  Verse  11  “Can  the  papyrus
           grow  up  without  a  marsh?  Can  the  rushes  grow  without  water?”
           These seem to be proverbs which were  taken from the ancients. If  you
           read the sermons of Bildad, and you can find them in chapter 8, 18 and
           25,  you  will  find  that  he  almost  exclusively  built  his  arguments  on
           something someone else said. He was a student. I remember E, Eliphaz,
           for Experience, and B, Bildad, for Books. He was a student; he studied all
           the tradition. He quoted everybody. So and so said this. He does not have
           his own reasoning.
                                                                        65
   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70