Page 155 - ACCESS BANK ANNUAL REPORTS_eBook
P. 155

•      Individual impairment assessment      For individually significant loans, we evaluated the reason-
                                                             ableness of management’s identification of impairment
                •      Collective impairment assessment      triggers.This was done by applying a risk based target
                                                             testing approach in selecting a sample of customer
                The individual impairment assessment is performed in
                order to determine if there is any objective evidence of   facilities for detailed reviews of customer files and account
                loan impairment                              statements to determine whether or not the customers
                                                             met with their contractual obligations as well as identify
                Where an objective evidence of impairment is identified,   other indicators of impairment.
                these facilities are assessed based on their recoverable
                amounts i.e. present value of expected future cash flows   For individually significant loans where impairment triggers
                discounted at the original effective interest rate, or the fair   were identified, we reviewed management’s impairment
                value of the collateral.                     assessment by comparing the fair value of the collateral to
                                                             the total exposure.
                Where the recoverable amount is less than the carrying
                value of the facilities, management determines impair-  Where the fair value of the collateral was insufficient to
                ment loss as the difference between the carrying value   cover the total exposure, we checked to ensure that spe-
                and the recoverable amount.                  cific impairment was recognized on such loans.
                                                             Where the fair value of the collateral sufficiently covered
                Management uses external valuers to determine the fair
                value of collateral.                         the total exposure, we reviewed to determine that these
                                                             category of facilities were assessed for collective impair-
                Allowances against all loans and advances not assessed   ment.
                individually and those assessed individually for which
                recoverable amount was higher than the carrying value are   For significant facilities with impairment triggers, we
                done on a collective basis.                  obtained the collateral valuation report supporting the
                                                             facilities.  We selected samples of the collateral valuation
                Impairment allowances on the loans to be assessed col-  reports and evaluated the competence, independence
                lectively is done using a modelled basis for different port-  and objectivity of management’s experts.
                folios with common features and allowances are adjusted
                accordingly based on the judgement of management.   We applied a risk based targeted testing approach in
                                                             performing a review of the collateral valuation reports by
                Primary data fundamental to the assessment of collective   checking the contract agreement between the bank and
                impairment is the Probability of Default (PD), the Loss Giv-  the customer to assess the bank’s legal rights over the
                en Default (LGD) and the exposure at default (EAD); which   collateral.
                are all obtained using the bank’s historical data, prevailing
                economic and credit conditions and loss experiences on   For the collective impairment assessment, we evaluat-
                how:                                         ed the reasonableness of management’s assumptions
                                                             with respect to the inputs into the collective impairment
                •   Facilities have migrated between risk ratings over the   model.
                    periods (PD);
                                                             We assessed the reasonableness of the probability of
                •   Portion of the loan facilities determined to be irrecov-  default (PD) by estimating how loan customers have mi-
                    erable at the time of default (LGD); and  grated from the performing grade to the impaired assets
                                                             grade in prior periods and determined an average risk
                •   Loan amount at the time of default (EAD).  rating per grade.

                This is considered a key audit matter in both the consoli-  We evaluated the reasonableness of the Loss GivenDe-
                dated and separate financial statements.     fault (LGD) by comparing it with the bank’s historical data
                                                             and supporting documents.



                Valuation of available for sale investment securities –
                N69.6 billion (refer to notes 3.9, 4.1 and 25)
                We focused on this area because of the significant   We performed detailed evaluation of the validity and rea-
                judgements involved in estimating the fair value of these   sonableness of the techniques, inputs and the assump-
                instruments.                                 tions used by management.







                                                                                            Access BAnk Plc  155
                                                                                            Annual Report & Accounts  2017
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160