Page 157 - Legal Guide DEMO

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Task: Consent Search of Vehicle
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO

Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973).

In cases where an officer receives a voluntary consent to search an
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
auto, the search of the auto and the seizure of evidence or

contraband will be valid.

• An officer obtaining consent need not tell the person that they have

LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
the right to refuse the officer’s request however where the person is
informed, it is more likely that consent will be found to be voluntary.

• Voluntariness determined by factors such as age, experience,

cooperative atmosphere of stop, whether there was any coercive
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
conduct on the part of the police.

Caution: Initial stop must be valid and some lower courts have
determined that consent obtained after the reason for the stop has

been concluded invalidates the consent as the result of an illegal
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
detention.

156
LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO LLRMI - DEMO
©2020 Jack Ryan Legal & Liability Risk Management Institute