Page 137 - Clackamas County Watertourism Strategic Plan. Final.v3
P. 137

STRATEGIC PLAN FOR WATER-BASED TOURISM IN CLACKAMAS COUNTY, OREGON                                         THE OPPORTUNITIES
                                                                                                                                                                                               6-34


               There are many approaches to creating a county wide visitor counting system.  The final product will result from a collaborative effort between all the     Institutional &
               entities that collect data on visitors.  So, the final product cannot be determined here.  Currently, there is a wide range of disconnected and uncoordinated   Organizational
               entities colleting visitor data including state parks, county parks, municipal parks, visitor bureaus and Chambers of Commerce, federal agencies, PGE, and
               large private destinations.  Each entity collects data differently, using different fields, at different frequencies, and they are stored differently, or even
               discarded in some cases.  What is recommended here is the creation of a consistent data collection protocol across all entities.  The DMO should coordinate
               the creation of this database, monitor its implementation and be the collector, repository, and guardian of these data.
               Recommendation 46: Create the Water Tourism and Economic Resiliency (WaTER) Advisory Board for Clackamas County
               Approximately 25 of the recommendations presented here require coordination across multiple entities.  Establishing a regional visitor database, creating
               the largest river celebration in the state, building a bridge across Estacada Lake are just a few examples of projects that will require cooperation across
               several levels of government.  This project was funded and directed by the Mt Hood Territory DMO but only a minority of the recommendations can be implemented by them
               alone.  Therefore, this entire report is at risk of not being fully implemented because the other relevant and responsible entities may not be wholly committed to these
               outcomes.  Over the course of this project, many stakeholders were consulted, interviewed, invited to focus groups, and surveyed.  All reasonable attempts were made to work
               with them as best as possible within the confines of this project’s scope.  Nonetheless, the project is concluding with a large number of recommendations that need these
               entities’ cooperation, advise, expertise, and maybe even approval.  Therefore, creating an interagency advisory board is necessary and highly recommended.  The Water Tourism
               and Economic Resiliency (WaTER) Advisory Board would be comprised of all relevant entities that would be involved in these recommendations.  They would be responsible for
               meeting to review these recommendations, ensuring their applicability, modifying them as necessary, soliciting resources as needed, and monitoring their progress.  The WaTER
               Advisory Board would start with being presented with the details of this plan, being knowledgeable of the data and supporting justifications for the recommendations, then
               reviewing the recommendations to create buy-in, and finally using the implementation framework as a starting draft to modify and adjust timelines, budgets, responsibilities
               and monitoring protocols.  This process may take 4-6 months before a detailed and implementable plan can emerge.

               Creating a new entity is not recommended, only a reshuffling of exiting staff who are currently involved.  All levels of government should be involved including: municipal
               economic development and parks; county and state marketing and recreation entities; federal agencies; non-profit organizations; and private sector interests.  The exact name
               of this group, their title (council, board, committee), and its level of authority does not matter much.  However, the people involved should be highly knowledgeable in water-
               based recreation, economic development, and tourism in Clackamas County.  They should be invited/appointed by the county and recognized by them as advisory to the county
               commissioners.  Without a cooperative board of this type, the author is convinced that many of this report’s recommendations will be very difficult to implement.
               Recommendation 47: Molalla River Management Structure
               The Molalla River Corridor does not have a stable or fully resourced management structure that is suitable for the level of visitation is receives.  The upper corridor, referred to
               as Molalla River-Table Rock Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA), is the most visited section and currently managed by the BLM out of the Salem office.  The BLM has
               been working with the Molalla River Watch and the Molalla River Alliance to manage the SRMA.  However, with limited resources and visitation of approximately 50,000 people
               per year, this management structure is inadequate.  The volunteer organizations can’t provide enough people to keep the campground open and the BLM does have enough
               money to pay salaries.  The result is the campgrounds are closed but still used illegally.  A long-term solution for the management of this corridor is needed.  Finding the correct
   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142