Page 23 - Michael Frost-Voyages to Maturity-23531.indd
P. 23

room had begun to disappear because of the endeavours of Japan and Korea
                to formulate a new industrial base, which, it was clear to those who chose to
                look, those societies could successfully effect with their substantially lower costs
                and highly motivated working classes. The old saw of “Who won the war?” was
                common in areas like Newcastle and nearby Sunderland, where heavily bombed
                and devastated neighbourhoods felt that they were competing with yards in Japan
                that enjoyed a completely reconstructed infrastructure; those countries’ bombed
                cities were razed while ours were merely damaged, the former rebuilt (there was
                no choice), the other withering because of the shortage of public money.
                   A note should be made here respecting ship size and the progress of ships’
                design and purposes. Firstly, while Khyber had a gross tonnage of 7,674, this figure
                is not easily compared with other vessels. The ship had a ‘net’ tonnage of 4,592,
                but small tankers, in most respects much larger ships, were of 12,298 gross tons
                (Mantua) and 24,266 gross tons (Malwa). Later, I served on Oriana (41,915 gross
                tons, then a large passenger ship) and Chitral (a passenger/cargo ship of 13,821
                gross tons). By way of comparison, Titanic had a gross tonnage of 46,328 and a
                displacement tonnage of 52,310. Nowadays the scale is, many would say, simply
                warped, Allure of the Seas, a cruise vessel, weighing in at 225,282 gross tons.

                   Secondly, all of the tonnage specifications have their particular purposes,
                and one cannot directly compare gross, net, deadweight, cargo and displacement
                tonnage; some are best suited for passenger ships, one or two for tankers, and one
                for bulk and LNG carriers. Tugs and warships enjoy their own measurements.

                   And thirdly, there was likewise substantial variety in ships’ propulsion. While
                only the Woolwich Ferry and a few old ships (and even British admiralty tugs)
                were propelled by paddle wheels with steam-reciprocating engines, the variety
                thereafter included steam turbines (then the norm). Additionally, there was a
                growing number of diesel-powered motor ships, some turbo-electric and even
                some nuclear; though the USS Enterprise and Savannah were nuclear, less than
                200 nuclear-powered commercial ships have been built, the major exception
                being the very fine France (in its declining days Norway) which was designed to
                be converted to nuclear power but which modification never actually occurred.
                There were some oddities as well, tugs that had propellers which could operate in
                any direction, jet-like nozzles, even new-style sailing ships!

                   The main transformative maritime changes that were beginning to occur in the
                1960s were, however, more readily apparent. Most notably, the containerisation
                revolution  had started  and was becoming significant.  This transformation
                of cargo-handling affected the huge number of ships of  Khyber’s generation,

                                                  22
   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28