Page 352 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra Vol 4
P. 352
wqqrl qFrilq-c lBl
aq eut tR eilrtis qrq ent. cdqt crq sIqIEr ilGIIitT {Id; (( w
?d erqa silrtccr erftfl<rfl erilafi, dui, qercrdri Ffcr sqrqquni
g{cqt{r ffia} i-<iq wft; wFr qr efiErqrer{ ,ildfsr Rqn qTrn;tr
fFqr<H a +rei erwqqfd-€ t+qqrsqdq *or crfEi. e{LqH e{Tr€rl
sq.$diwrf, milfu( ql,q q1qqu1 ttte e+to; qur KqrErT sqlsqrc w d
grr*ori 16q1 g+cqurri +rzd, d( {rq< qrrtqilq srlcerl rqquqr{l (R
orXr io<nr +i{i qrrt sle fr cr€i, at car qR. ei. e}r, ivr, fii(qa,
mafl qt=q qil e+tqwt+r er{ls crfl errFr iedsiqr qd errt; qii+t
<+q enft qffir dor, r cflri wr crfei errt. € s<< Ed{i-{qr
*dli f{Er tdv ergqe Rd qfti sTH' {aqrucTq ieqr ffi +i€i errq<
en€ qrcf{'A di. cqt.qrfrrq e*rrQlt={ eriqflw{€ €FIr.q ftqrq-
t{v gea +}qmiq e+rqn +Joft qK{Ridr rrfl. '<i }d{qr g<+iflo
E[ (Ic|-eI .rlm te$ eilE; qur 3lqqTFit tiid eiqdTr q|q *$Rri
" s,i qqil n ffiqaat ergwri errqrmi rtgd risetq ctft+d, ,' eril
q qifl,Tdd erft, tn +{aqr{ q< erqqH taete *"ir o< u< t<t{, Wat
tcri fr-{R *-sr a€i. EI R-qR fhv, Rtrr, *rs4, fru, qtRqr dqiaFq
srtt. +dt Rcq--qT {qidts eil.Tn qril err{qi iqa err?a. emi q€ qidi
qrqi+{rilffi sl]iE flq qroP{uqr=qT qqdlq< il cq FltCIr erlt, ete qr
f{qqrsqo flq sifW srft A cK.*e tqaj-
" The will of the majority is the supfeme power in all delibere-
tive assemblies. If, therefore, any member thinks the Chairman
has not decided the question correctly, or in accordance with
justice, or if he considers himself aggrieved by a decision of the
Chairman, or if any member desires to correct a decision of the
Chair which was hastily or erroneously made, or possibly made
under undue influence, it is the privilege of any member to appeal
to the assembly. The object of an appeal is to give the assembly
an opportunity to correct such decision. The form is, 'I appeal
from the decision of the Chair. ' An appeal must be made at once
or the question is presumed to have been correctly decided and
is not afterwards subject to appeal. This does not require recog-
nition from the Chair, is debatable, unless it refers to indecorum,
or a violation of the rules, or to priority of business . . . .. .. .While
a point of order is undebatable, unless so requested by the Chair,
an appeal from the decision of the Chair on a point of order is
debatable. "