Page 220 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 220

PREHISTORIC  TIMES                 7
          the  same results  as  the hireoglyphics  in the hands  of the Egypto-
          logist.  These  early  implements  of  stone  and  metals  were  not
          previously  unknown,  but  they  bad  not  attracted  the  notice  of
          scientific experts till recently and the peasants in Asia  and Europe,
          when they found them in their fields, could hardly make any better
          use of them than that of worshipping the implements so  found  as
          thunderbolts  or  fairy  arrows  shot  down  from  the  sky.  But  now
          after a careful study of these remains, archreologists have come  to
          the conclusion that these implements, whose human origin is  now
          undoubtedly  established  can  be  classified  into  those  of  Stone
          ( including  horn,  wood  or bone ),  those  of Bronze  and  those  of
          Iron, representing three different stages of civilization in the progress
          of man in prehistoric times.  Thus the implements of stone,  wood
          or bone, such  as chisels,  scrapers,  arrow-heads,  hatches,  daggers,
          etc.  were  used  when the use  of metal was  yet unknown and they
          were  gradually  supplanted first  by the  implements  of bronze  and
          then  of iron,  when  the  ancient  man  discovered  the  use  of these
          metals. It is not to be supposed, however, that these three different
          periods of early human civilisation were divided by any hard  and
          fast  line  of division.  They  represent  only  a  rough  classification,
          the passage from one period into another being slow and gradual.
          Thus the implements of stone must have continued to be used for
          a long time after the use of bronze became known to the  ancient
          man,  and  the  same  thing  must have  occurred  as  he  passed  from
          the Bronze to the Iron age. The age of bronze, which is a compound
          of copper and tin in a  definite proportion, requires  an antecedent
          age of copper; but sufficient evidence is not yet found to prove the
          separate existence of copper and tin ages, and hence it is considered
          probable that the art of making bronze was not invented in Europe
          but was introduced there from other countries either by commerce
          or by the Indo-European race going there from outside.*  Another
          fact  which  requires  to  be  noted  in  connection with  these  ages  is
          that the Stone or the Bronze age in one country was not necessarily
          synchronous  with  the  same  age  in  another  country.  Thus  we
          find a high state of civilization in Egypt at about 6000 B.  C.  when
          the inhabitants of Europe were in the early stages of the Stone  age.
          Similarly Greece had advanced to the Iron age, while Italy was still
          in the Bronze period and the West of Europe in the age of Stone.


             "Lubbock's Prehistoric Times,  18go Ed.,  pp.  4  and 64.
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225