Page 242 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 242

THE  GLACIAL  PERIOD               29
           then produce the climatic changes it did in the Pleistocene period.
           This  reply  practically  concedes  that  the  high  eccentricity  of the
           earth's  orbit,  combined  with  the  occurrence  of winter  when  the
           earth  is  at  aphelion,  is  not  by  itself  sufficient  to  bring  about  a
           Glacial period; and it may, therefore, be well  urged that a Glacial
           epoch may occur even when the eccentricity is not at its  maximum.
           Another point in which Dr. Croll's theory conflicts with the geolo-
           gical  evidence  is  the  date  of the  close  of the  last  Glacial  epoch,
           ascertained,  by  the  American  geologists,  from  estimates  based
           on the erosion of valleys since the close of the  last Glacial period.
          It is  pointed  out in  the  last  chapter that  these  estimates  do  not
           carry  the  beginning  of  the  Post-Glacial  period  much  further
           than about 10,000 years ago at the best; while Dr.  Croll's calcula-
           tion  would  carry  it back  to  80  or  100  thousand  years.  This  is  a
          serious  difference  and  even  Prof.  Geikie,  who  does  not entirely
          accept  the  American  view,  is  obliged  to  admit  that  though  Dr.
          Croll's theory is the only theory that accounts for the  succession of
          Glacial epochs and therefore, the  only correct theory,  yet  the for-
           mula  employed  by him to calculate the values  of the  eccentricity
          of the earth's orbit may be incorrect and that we  may thus account
          for  the  wide  discrepancy  between  his  inference  and  the  conclu-
          sions  based  upon  hard  geological  facts,  which  cannot  be  lightly
          set  aside.*  The judgment recently  pronounced  by  Mr.  Hudleston
          is  still  more  severe.  In  his  opening  address,  as  President  of the
          geological  section  of the  meeting  of the  British  Association  in
           1898,  he  is  reported  to  have  remarked, , "  There  is  ,probably
          nothing  more  extraordinary  in  the  history  of modern  investiga-
          tion than the extent to which geologists of an earlier date permitted
          themselves  to  be  led  away  by  the  fascinating  theories  of Croll.
          The  astronomical explanation of that 'Will-o' -the-wisp', the cause
          of the great Ice Age, is at present greatly  discredited and we begin
          to  estimate  at their  true  value  those  elaborate calculations  which
          were  made  to  account for events,  which,  in  all  probability,  never
          occurred.  Extravagance begets extravagance and the  unreasonable
           peculations of men  like Belt  and Croll  have  caused some of our
          recent  students  to  suffer  from  the  nightmare. "t This  criticism
          appears  to  be  rather  severe;  for  though  Dr.  Croll's  elaborate


              "Fragments of Earth Lore.  p. 287.
              t  See  The Nature,  Sept.  I 5,  T 8g8.
   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247