Page 413 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 413

198        SAMAGRA  TILAK- 2  •  THE  ARCTIC  HOME
            thunderstorm  implied  rain  as  a  matter  of course.  If the  Maruts
            helped  Indra in  the  battle.  it was  easily  explained  by  the  Storm
            theory  because  a  thunderstorm  or rain  was  always  accompanied
            by stormy weather.  But a more difficult point in the legend,  which
            required  explanation,  was  the hemming in  or the  captivating  of
            the waters by Vritra or Ahi. In the case of waters in the clouds  it
            was easy to imagine that they were kept captive in the cloud by the
            demon  of drought.  But the  ~ig-Veda often  speaks  of sindhus  or
            streams being released by the slaughter ofVritra; and if the streams
            or rivers  really represented,  as  conceived by  the advocates  of this
            theory, the rivers of the Punjab, it was rather difficult to understand
            how they  could be described  as  being hemmed in or kept captive
            by Vritra.  But the ingenuity of Vedic scholars was quite equal to
            the occasion, and it was suggested that, as the rivers in India often
            get entirely  dried  up  in summer, the god of the rainy season, who
            called  them  back  to  life,  could  be  rightly  described  as  releasing
            them from the grasp of Vritra. The Indian Nairuktas do not appear
            to  have  extended  the  theory  any  further.  But  in  the  hands  of
            German  mythologians  the Storm theory became almost a  rival to
            the  Dawn  theory;  and  stories,  like  that  of  Saral}yu,  have  been
            explained  by  them as  referring  to the  movements  of dark  storm-
            clouds hovering in the  sky.  "  Clouds,  storms,  rains, lightning and
            thunder, "  observes  Prof.  Kuhn,  "  were  the spectacles that above
            all  others  impressed  the  imagination  of the  early  Aryans  and
            busied it most in finding  terrestrial  objects  to compare with their
            ever-varying  aspects.  The  beholders  were  at home  on  the  earth,
            and  the things  on  the earth were comparatively familiar to  them;
            even  the  coming  and  going  of  the  celestial  luminaries  might
            often be regarded by them with more composure,  because of their
            regularity; but they could never surcease to feel the liveliest interest
            in those wonderful meteoric changes, so lawless and mysterious in
            their  visitations,  which  wrought  such  immediate  and  palpable
            effects for good or ill upon the lives and fortunes of the beholders.*
            For  this  reason  Prof.  Kuhn  thinks  that  these  meteorological
            phenomena  are  the  principal  ground-work  of all  Indo-European
            mythologies  and  superstitions;  and in  accordance with  this  creed
            Prof. Roth explains Sara~yu as the dark storm-cloud soaring in the

                •  See i\fax .Mull er's Lectures on  the Science of Language,  Vol.  II.
            p.  s66.
   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418