Page 506 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 506

VEDIC  MYTHS- THE  MATUTINAL  DEITIES      287
          and  darkness,  or  the  conquest  of spring  over  winter,  or  of the
          storm-god over  clouds.  Thus  we  have  not  been  able  as  yet  to
          explain  why  Vritra  was  killed  once  a  year,  why  the  waters  and
          the  light  were  described  as  being  released  simultaneously  by
          killing  Vritra,  or  why  Indra's  fight  with  Shambara  was  said
          to have  commenced  on  the  40th  day  of Sharad,  or  why  the
          fight  was  said  to  be  conducted  in  the  paravat  regions,  why
          Dirghatamas was  described as  having  grown  old  in  the  lOth
          yuga,  why  Marta'!l9a  was  cast  away  as  a  dead  son,  why  Trita,
          or the  Third,  was  said  to  have  fallen  into  a  pit,  or again  why
          Vi~h'!lu's third  stride  was  said  to be  invisible.  We  now  find  that
          not  only  all  these  but many  more  incidents  in  the  Vedic  myths
          are  satisfactorily  accounted  for,  and  the  legends  in  their  turn
          directly  lead  us  to  the  Arctic  theory.  The  legends  of Indra  and
          Vritra,  of  Saptavadhri,  of Aditi  and  her  seven  flourishing  and
          one  still-born  son,  of  Sftrya's  wheel  and  of  Dirghatamas,  are
          again  found  to  contain  express  passages  which  indicate  seven
          or  ten  months'  period  of  sunshine  at  the  place,  where  these
          legends  originated;  and  unless  we  are  prepared  to  say  that  all
          these  may  be  accidental  coincidences,  we  cannot,  I  think,  legi-
          timately withhold  our assent to  a theory which  explains  so  many
          facts,  and  incidents,  hitherto  ignored,  neglected  or  misunder-
          stood,  in  an  easy,  natural  and  intelligible  manner.  I  do  not
          mean  to  say  that  the  Arctic  theory  would  entirely  dispense  with
          the  necessity  of the  Dawn,  the  Storm  or  the Vernal  theory.  All
          that  I  contend  for  is  that  the  Arctic  theory  explains  a  number
          of legendary  or  traditional  facts  hitherto  hopelessly  given  up  as
          inexplicable  and  that  in  the  interpretation  of  Vedic  myths  it
          furnishes  us  with  a  weapon  far  more  powerful  and  effective
          than either  the  Dawn,  the  Storm  or the  Vernal  theory.  In short,
          from  a  mythological  point  of view  alone,  there  is  ample  ground
          to recommend it to our acceptance side by side with, and in some
          cases,  even  in  substitution  of the  old  theories.  In  addition  to
          this  it has  been  already  shown in previous  chapters  that  the  new
          theory  rests  on  direct  and  independent  statements  of  facts
          contained  in  the  :{{ig-Veda,  about  the  duration  and  nature  of
          the  Dawn,  days  and  nights,  seasons,  months  and  the  year  in
          the  home  of the  ancient  fathers  of the  Vedic  :{{i~his;  and  that
          the  Avestic  and  Roman  traditions  fully  corroborate  our  conclu-
          sion.  We  have  further  seen  that  the  theory  is  perfectly  consist-
   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511