Page 131 - HBR's 10 Must Reads on Strategic Marketing
P. 131

ANDERSON, NARUS, AND ROSSUM



            industrial gas supplier illustrates this perspective. A customer sent
            the company a request for proposal stating that the two or three sup-
            pliers that could demonstrate the most persuasive value proposi-
            tions would be invited to visit the customer to discuss and refine
            their proposals. After this meeting, the customer would select a sole
            supplier for this business. As this example shows, “Why should our
            firm purchase your offering instead of your competitor’s?” is a more
            pertinent question than “Why should our firm purchase your offer-
            ing?” The first question focuses suppliers on differentiating their of-
            ferings  from  the  next  best  alternative,  a  process  that  requires
            detailed  knowledge  of  that  alternative,  whether  it  be  buying  a
            competitor’s offering or solving the customer’s problem in a differ-
            ent way.
              Knowing that an element of an offering is a point of difference
            relative to the next best alternative does not, however, convey the
            value of this difference to target customers. Furthermore, a prod-
            uct or service may have several points of difference, complicating
            the supplier’s understanding of which ones deliver the greatest
            value.  Without  a  detailed  understanding  of  the  customer’s
            requirements and preferences, and what it is worth to fulfill them,
            suppliers may stress points of difference that deliver relatively
            little value to the target customer. Each of these can lead to the
            pitfall of value presumption: assuming that favorable points of
            difference  must  be  valuable  for  the  customer.  Our  opening
            anecdote about the IC supplier that unnecessarily discounted its
            price exemplifies this pitfall.

            Resonating focus
            Although the favorable points of difference value proposition  is
            preferable to an all benefits proposition for companies crafting a
            consumer value proposition, the resonating focus value proposition
            should be the gold standard. This approach acknowledges that the
            managers who make purchase decisions have major, ever-increasing
            levels of responsibility and often are pressed for time. They want to
            do business with suppliers that fully grasp critical issues in their
            business and deliver a customer value proposition that’s simple yet


            120
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136