Page 173 - HBR's 10 Must Reads - On Sales
P. 173

HOW TO REALLY MOTIVATE SALESPEOPLE



            effectively incentivized by a yearly quota and bonus, more-frequent
            goals helped keep lower performers on track. Some people compare
            the way people compensate a sales force to the way teachers mo-
            tivate students: Top students will do fine in a course in which the
            entire grade is determined by a final exam, but lower-performing
            students need frequent quizzes and tests during the semester to mo-
            tivate them to keep up. Our study showed that the same general rule
            applies to sales compensation.
              Our research also suggested  that the  firm would benefit  if it
            shifted from quarterly bonuses to cumulative quarterly bonuses.
            For example, say a salesperson is supposed to sell 300 units in the
            first quarter and 300 units in the second quarter. Under a regular
            quarterly plan, a salesperson who misses that number in the first
            quarter but sells 300 units in the second quarter will still get the
            second-quarter bonus. Under a cumulative system, the rep needs
            to  have  cumulative  (year-to-date)  sales  of  600  units  to  get  the
            second-quarter bonus, regardless of his first-quarter performance.
            Cumulative quotas do a better job of keeping reps motivated during
            periods in which they’re showing poor results, because reps know
            that even if they’re going to miss their number, any sales they  can
            squeeze out will help them reach their cumulative number for the
            next period. In fact, even  before we made our recommendations
            to the company in our study, managers there decided to move to
            cumulative quotas.


            Out of the Lab, into the Field
            In addition to sharing sales and compensation data with academics,
            companies in the past several years have been allowing controlled,
            short-term field experiments in which researchers adjust reps’ pay
            and measure the effects. Prior to the use of field experiments, most
            academic experiments regarding sales force compensation took
            place  in  labs  and  involved  volunteers  (usually  undergraduates)
            rather than real salespeople. Shifting from this artificial setting into
            actual companies helps make the results of these studies more prac-
            tical and convincing.


                                                                   157
   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178