Page 31 - HBR's 10 Must Reads 20180 - The Definitive Management Ideas of the Year from Harvard Business Review
P. 31

LAFLEY AND MARTIN



            to consciously decide about routine purchases and offers providers
            the lure of effortlessly recurring revenue.
              The theory of cumulative advantage makes a lot of sense in what
            Martin  Reeves  and  his  colleagues  at  BCG  call  a  classical  strategic
            setting—one  in  which  industry  boundaries  are    clearly    delineated,
            the  basis  of  competition  is  stable,  the  environment  experiences  no
            major  disruptions,  and  a  strong  competitive  position,  once  created,
            can be sustained. As BCG has shown, the candy company Mars has
            enjoyed very long product life cycles: Snickers and M&M’s (intro-
            duced  in  1930  and  1941,  respectively)  are  among  the  best-selling
            candies in the world today. Procter & Gamble has a similarly strong
            track record with Tide, Unilever with Dove, and PepsiCo with Tropi-
            cana orange juice.
              But for a growing number of companies, those conditions don’t
            apply. Their industry boundaries aren’t clearly delineated—in fact,
            they’re totally blurry. Just ask anyone in retail, entertainment, or
            telecommunications. Their environments aren’t stable—companies
            can be disrupted by entrants from below, as Clayton Christensen has
            pointed out, but also by competitors using a different business model
            or moving over from an adjacent industry. And long-standing com-
            petitive strengths can be upended almost overnight by someone who
            has digitized your physical business (hello, Encyclopaedia Britannica)
            or turned your product into a service (see Zipcar, Airbnb, and Uber).
            Apple and Google didn’t necessarily intend to disrupt point-and-shoot
            cameras, stand-alone GPS devices, TV advertising, or the Weather
            Channel, but they did so nonetheless. (See the sidebar “It Works Until
            It Doesn’t: The Changing Nature of Competitive Advantage.”)


            Strategic Inflection Points
            For some time my argument has been that we need a new way of
            thinking  about  strategy  in  environments  where  traditional  barri-
            ers to entry are eroding, or in which emerging technologies weaken
            constraints. Andy Grove’s phrase inflection point captures this situa-
            tion nicely. A strategic inflection point, he says, is “a time in the life
            of a business when its fundamentals are about to change.” Inflec-


                                                                   15
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36