Page 4 - belajar e-book bos-dikonversi
P. 4

right support from an adult or peer. ZPD is seen as a metaphorical site where learners and an

                    interlocutor construct knowledge and the emphasis in ZPD is placed on development.


                3.  Criticism

                           A  theory  of  learning  is  like  a  coin  which  has  positive  and  negative  sides.  It  also
                    happens to these theories of learning  Structuralism theory, in one side, is able to make the

                    beginners or the young learners easily learn a certain language; on the other side, it also has
                    something to be criticized.

                           The core of the structuralism in fact is the structure. This theory of learning conveys
                    more learning activities which need memorization, for example: how to write and speak in

                    certain  language  properly.  These  give  a  mechanical  sense  to  young  learners  so  that  they

                    cannot  creatively  construct  sentences.  Learners  in  fact  easily  understand  the  sentence
                    structure while they are difficult to speak or write creatively within a certain language they

                    learn.
                           In  the  other  hand,  sentence  structure  is  not  underlined  in  socio-cultural  learning

                    theory, while the communication and the interaction are important in this theory. Therefore,
                    learners are supposed to communicate and interact within their environment much. As long

                    as  the  communication  and  the  interaction  happen  in  the  process  of  learning,  learners  are

                    believed to develop their knowledge. As the result, learners apply a certain language as long
                    as to get message through a communication while it is not important whether or not learners

                    communicate structurally correct or not.


                4.  Conclusion

                           The structuralism learning theory was firstly brought by Saussure (1916) through his
                    assumption that a language can be broken down into smaller elements and each element in

                    the sentences exclusively correlates one into the others. This learning theory merits to the
                    young learners who sit in elementary or intermediate levels because the sentence structures

                    are quit important for them to learn a certain language, they then imitate the structure to

                    make sentences.
                           On  the  other  side,  socio-culture  learning  theory  was  firstly  brought  by  Vygotsky

                    (1986)  with  an  assumption  that  learning  development  occur  as  the  result  of  interaction
                    within  the  environment  of  learners.  In  this  learning  theory,  learners  are  supposed  to  get

                    much interaction with their environment to internalize the knowledge from a discussion for
                    example to construct a deep understanding. This merits to advanced learners because they

            A comparison between Structuralism and Socio-Cultural
   1   2   3   4   5